22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 36–4

Side Effects of Inhaled Corticosteroids

Local side effects

Dysphonia

Oropharyngeal candidiasis

Cough

Systemic side effects

Adrenal suppression and insufficiency

Growth suppression

Bruising

Osteoporosis

Cataracts

Glaucoma

Metabolic abnormalities (glucose, insulin, triglycerides)

Psychiatric disturbances (euphoria, depression)

Pneumonia

needed to control the asthma, and by use of a large-volume spacer to

reduce oropharyngeal deposition.

Several systemic effects of inhaled steroids have been

described and include dermal thinning and skin capillary fragility

(relatively common in elderly patients after high-dose inhaled

steroids). Other side effects, such as cataract formation and osteoporosis,

are reported but often in patients who are also receiving

courses of oral steroids. There has been particular concern about the

use of inhaled steroids in children because of growth suppression

(Pedersen, 2001). Most studies have been reassuring that doses ≤400

μg/day have not been associated with impaired growth; on the

contrary, there may even be a growth spurt as asthma is better controlled.

There is some evidence that use of high-dose ICS is associated

with cataract and glaucoma, but it is difficult to dissociate the

effects of ICS from the effects of courses of oral steroids that these

patients usually require.

ICS may have local side effects due to the deposition of inhaled

steroid in the oropharynx. The most common problem is hoarseness

and weakness of the voice (dysphonia) due to atrophy of the vocal cords

following laryngeal deposition of steroid; it may occur in up to 40% of

patients and is noticed particularly by patients who need to use their

voices during their work (lecturers, teachers, and singers). Throat

irritation and coughing after inhalation are common with MDI and

appear to be due to additives because these problems are not usually

seen if the patient switches to a DPI. There is no evidence for atrophy

of the lining of the airway. Oropharyngeal candidiasis occurs in ~5%

of patients. There is no evidence for increased lung infections, including

tuberculosis, in patients with asthma. Growing evidence suggests

that high doses of ICS increase the risk of pneumonia in patients with

COPD (Singh et al., 2009); although this is reported with high doses of

fluticasone propionate, a similar increase in pneumonia has not been

found with budesonide, which may be explained by its lower systemic

effects (Sin et al., 2009).

It may be difficult to extrapolate systemic side effects of corticosteroids

using data from normal subjects. In asthmatic patients,

systemic absorption form the lung is reduced, presumably because

of reduced and more central deposition of the inhaled drug in more

severe patients (Brutsche et al., 2000; Harrison et al., 2001); most of

the inhaled drug deposits in larger airways, thereby limiting effects

in the smaller airways where inflammation is also found, especially

in patients with severe asthma. Corticosteroid MDIs with HFA propellants

produce smaller aerosol particles and may have a more

peripheral deposition, making them useful in treating patients with

more severe asthma.

Therapeutic Choices. Numerous ICS are now available

including beclomethasone dipropionate (QVAR), triamcinolone,

flunisolide (AEROBID), budesonide (PULMICORT,

others), fluticasone hemihydrate (AEROSPAN), fluticasone propionate

(FLOVENT), mometasone furoate (ASMANEX), and

ciclesonide (ALVESCO). All are equally effective as antiasthma

drugs, but there are differences in their pharmacokinetics:

Budesonide, fluticasone, mometasone, and

ciclesonide have a lower oral bioavailability than

beclomethasone dipropionate because they are subject

to greater first-pass hepatic metabolism; this results in

reduced systemic absorption from the fraction of the

inhaled drug that is swallowed (Derendorf et al., 2006)

and thus reduced adverse effects. At high doses (>1000 μg),

budesonide and fluticasone propionate have less systemic

effects than beclomethasone dipropionate and triamcinolone,

and they are preferred in patients who need

high doses of ICS and in children. Ciclesonide is

another choice; it is a prodrug that is converted to the

active metabolite by esterases in the lung, giving it a

low oral bioavailability and a high therapeutic index

(Manning et al., 2008).

When doses of inhaled steroid exceed 800 μg

beclomethasone dipropionate or equivalent daily, a

large volume spacer is recommended to reduce oropharyngeal

deposition and systemic absorption in the case

of beclomethasone dipropionate. All currently available

ICS are absorbed from the lung into the systemic circulation,

so that some systemic absorption is inevitable.

However, the amount of drug absorbed does not appear

to have clinical effects in doses of <800 g beclomethasone

dipropionate equivalent. Although there are

potency differences among corticosteroids, there are

relatively few comparative studies, partly because dose

comparison of corticosteroids is difficult due to their

long time course of action and the relative flatness of

their dose-response curves. Triamcinolone and flunisolide

appear to be the least potent, with beclomethasone

dipropionate and budesonide approximately of

equal potency; fluticasone propionate is approximately

twice as potent as beclomethasone dipropionate.

Future Developments. Early treatment with ICS in both

adults and children may give a greater improvement in

1051

CHAPTER 36

PULMONARY PHARMACOLOGY

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!