22.05.2022 Views

DƯỢC LÍ Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics 12th, 2010

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Environmental Toxicology:

Carcinogens and Heavy Metals

Michael C. Byrns

and Trevor M. Penning

Humans are exposed to chemicals from their environment

daily. Fortunately, mammals have evolved mechanisms

to protect themselves from toxic effects of many

exogenous chemicals, including the xenobiotic transport

and metabolic mechanisms described in Chapters 4-7.

While the human body is relatively well adapted to deal

with xenobiotics, there are situations in which such

environmental agents may cause significant toxicity.

The industrial revolution and the development of chemical

industries have increased human exposures to chemicals

that were previously infrequent or absent.

Occupational exposures to xenobiotics are of particular

concern because workers often will be exposed to specific

chemicals at concentrations that are orders of magnitude

higher than those to which the general population

is exposed. Increasing concern about environmental toxicants

has stimulated interest and research in environmental

toxicology, the study of how chemicals in our

environment adversely affect human health, and in occupational

toxicology, the study of how chemicals in the

workplace affect human health. Myriad authoritative

textbooks are available in these areas. This chapter does

not attempt a thorough coverage; rather, it sets forth a

few basic principles, briefly discusses carcinogens and

chemoprevention, and then focuses on the pharmacotherapy

of heavy metal intoxication.

ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESSMENT

AND RISK MANAGEMENT

When assessing the risks of environmental exposures to

xenobiotics, many of the same principles discussed in

Chapter 4 for drug toxicity apply; there are, however,

significant differences. With environmental exposures,

one has to consider population exposures to low-dose

toxicants over long periods of time. Thus, one must give

more attention to the low end of the dose-response

curve, using experiments based on chronic exposures.

Particular attention is given to the potential for individuals

with higher susceptibility. Unlike drugs, which are

given to treat a specific disease and will have benefits

that outweigh the risks, environmental toxicants usually

are only harmful. In addition, exposures to environmental

toxicants usually are involuntary, there is uncertainty

about the severity of their effects, and people are much

less willing to accept their associated risks.

Two complimentary approaches are used to predict

the toxic effects of environmental exposures: epidemiology

and toxicology. Epidemiologists monitor

health effects in humans and use statistics to associate

those effects with exposure to an environmental stress,

such as a toxicant. Toxicologists perform laboratory

studies to try to understand the potential toxic mechanisms

of a chemical to predict whether it is likely to be

toxic to humans. Each of these approaches has strengths

and weaknesses, and information from both is integrated

into environmental risk assessment. Risk assessment

is used to develop management approaches, such

as laws and regulations, to limit exposures to environmental

toxicants to a level that is considered safe.

Epidemiological Approaches to Risk Assessment

Epidemiologists use multiple approaches to assess the risks of human

environmental exposures (Gordis, 2008). The disadvantage of these

approaches is the variability between people in their exposures and

genetics, which results in confounding effects. Epidemiologists cannot

control the environment or the genetics of the populations being

studied. For example, generally individuals are simultaneously

exposed to more than one environmental toxicant.

Because of the difficulties in assessing human exposures and

the long times required to clinically observe effects on health, epidemiologists

rely on biomarkers in risk assessment. There are three

different types of biomarkers: biomarkers of exposure, biomarkers of

toxicity, and biomarkers of susceptibility. Biomarkers of exposure

usually are measurements of toxicants or their metabolites in blood,

urine, or hair. Blood and urine concentrations measure recent exposures,

while hair levels measure exposure over a period of months.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!