23.07.2013 Views

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE EFFECT OF THE ’92-REFORM OF THE VERP ON RETIREMENT AGE 171<br />

(1) be between 60 and 66 years of age.<br />

(2) have been a member of an unemployment insurance fund for 20 out of the last 25<br />

years (however, for people born before March 1952, the condition was 10 of the<br />

last 15 years, provided that the membership in the unemployment insurance fund<br />

was continuous from 31 March 1992 until transition to VERP). 5<br />

(3) have been working full-time for at least 26 weeks in the last three years, 6 be entitled<br />

to unemployment insurance benefit, or have received transitional benefits<br />

(the Transitional Benefit Program (TBP, overgangsydelse) was introduced 1 March<br />

1992 and was in force from 1992 to 1996). 7 After 1 January 1995, people who have<br />

received part-time VERP were also entitled to VERP benefits.<br />

(4) live in Denmark.<br />

In principle, it is possible for people aged 60-66 years to leave the VERP program<br />

once and re-enter later, provided that the third condition mentioned above is fulfilled<br />

once again. In practice, however, very few make use of this possibility, and therefore,<br />

such transitions are ignored in the analyses.<br />

In 1992, the normal retirement age was 67 (65 from 2004). At this age, VERP benefit<br />

recipients are transferred to old age pensions. The VERP program is generous in<br />

the sense that the amount of benefits does not affect the old age pension, which is<br />

independent of previous earnings. The replacement rate, when VERP benefits are<br />

received, is on average 70 percent of labour market income for low-income workers<br />

and 40 percent for high-income workers, cf. Bingley et al. (2003).<br />

In the period studied, the initial VERP benefits did not depend on the age at entry.<br />

Instead, it was reduced as a function of time spent in the program. Before 1 March<br />

1992, VERP benefits for the first two and a half years were equivalent to unemployment<br />

benefits, which amount to 90 percent of previous earnings, subject to a ceiling. 8<br />

After two and a half years, VERP benefits were reduced to a maximum of 80 percent<br />

of unemployment benefits 9 (and, after 1 January 1994, raised to a maximum of 82<br />

percent). After 1 March 1992, the reduction in VERP benefits after two and a half<br />

years was removed for workers who delayed retirement until at least age 63. These<br />

workers received a benefit equivalent to the unemployment benefit during the whole<br />

VERP period. 10 In other words, annual VERP benefits for people retiring at age 63-64<br />

5. Before 1 March 1992, it was 10 out of 15 years for everyone.<br />

6. After 1 January 1997, the condition was changed to at least 52 weeks in the last three years.<br />

7. For more information about this program, see Section 4.<br />

8. This ceiling is reached quite fast. In fact, the gross compensation percentage for an average production<br />

worker (as defined by the OECD) was 53% in 1997, see Hansen (1999).<br />

9. If benefits were below the maximum of 80 percent of unemployment benefits the first two and a half<br />

years, benefits were not reduced.<br />

10. The rules applied until the reform of the VERP in 1999.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!