23.07.2013 Views

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

362<br />

NATIONALØKONOMISK TIDSSKRIFT 2005. NR. 3<br />

given, 7 and in avoiding these ambiguities, we have decided to abstract from group<br />

exams and focus on individual written exams. In this sense, we are linking admission<br />

characteristics to performance that does not capture learning externalities (as these<br />

may be represented in group work). 8<br />

Before we proceed we should note that our analysis is not unique in the literature.<br />

First of all there exists an elaborative literature on these issues in international journals<br />

– see, e.g. the study by Naylor and Smith (2004) for universities in the UK and their<br />

references within. Clearly such an aggregation among universities introduces some<br />

noise to the data, a problem that is avoided in, e.g., Tay (1994) who looks at performance<br />

and admission characteristics of a particular program in Singapore. For the case<br />

of Denmark we are only aware of two other studies that ask questions similar to ours,<br />

viz. Albæk (2001) and Andersen and Østergaard (2005). Albæk analyses the probability<br />

of passing the first year of the economics programme at the University of Copenhagen.<br />

As one possible explanatory factor Albæk uses high-school GPAs. The focus in his study<br />

is the effects of the admission rules on the economics programme and on how the<br />

probability of passing first year is affected by various background variables. His results<br />

indicate that there is a significantly increased probability of passing first year for students<br />

with mathematics at level A from high-school. In addition to this, the passing probability<br />

also seems to increase for students who have spent a couple of years doing other<br />

things other than university studies before they begin the course. Both of these findings<br />

are supported by the study by Andersen and Østergaard (op.cit). 9<br />

2. Description of the data<br />

As mentioned above, the data have been collected for students who started the B.Sc.<br />

IB in 2002 and 2003, as these are the years where admission characteristics data have<br />

been systematically registered. CBS’s central student register (HSAS) provided the data<br />

on grades from individual written exams with the latest entry being August 2004. These<br />

data are confidential, as they are constructed on the basis of the individual civil<br />

7. The main question here is: »Has the student earned the grade as a result, or in spite, of the abilities of the<br />

other group members?«<br />

8. One should note, however, that many students prepare their individual written exams together with other<br />

students, and thus some form of learning externality cannot be precluded.<br />

9. Focusing on performance is also the topic in Lorentzen (2001) and Gabrielsen (1996a,b). The former<br />

paper analyses the background factors that leads to a good student performance at the English-language<br />

masters programmes at CBS. The latter papers investigate whether there is a »teacher effect« on the grades<br />

in the statistics course at CBS’ HD programme. While the latter paper does not examine the influence of<br />

admission characteristics (the focus of our paper), the former paper looks only at Bachelor GPA and country<br />

of origin as admission characteristics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!