23.07.2013 Views

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TAXATION OF SHAREHOLDER INCOME AND THE COST OF CAPITAL IN AN OPEN ECONOMY 439<br />

This distortionary effect of taxation will also prevail in the more likely case where<br />

investors are less than perfectly diversified. From (14) and (15) we see that unquoted<br />

shares with different risk characteristics will have different -values, in which case the<br />

personal shareholder income tax t will have a different impact on the cost of capital for<br />

different types of unquoted companies.<br />

4. A personal tax on the equity premium: Neutrality of the Norwegian tax<br />

regime in a world of well-diversified investors<br />

I will now show that this distortion may be eliminated if the shareholder income tax<br />

is levied only on the equity premium, defined as the excess of the rate of return on shares<br />

over the after-tax interest rate on risk-free bonds. Such a tax was proposed in<br />

Sørensen (2005a) and will be introduced in Norway from 2006.<br />

When shareholders are allowed a deduction for their opportunity cost of investment,<br />

given by the risk-free rate of return, the actual and expected after-tax returns on<br />

shares will be<br />

Rj =rj –t(rj –i), Re j =rej –t(rej –i), j= 1, 2, 3 (18)<br />

Note that the tax system in (18) is assumed to be symmetric: if shareholders fail to<br />

obtain a return equal to the risk free rate, they can deduct their »loss« i – r j against<br />

income from other shares (or they can carry their tax loss forward with interest so that<br />

the deduction maintains its present value). Under the tax regime (18) the variances and<br />

covariances of the net rates of return will still be given by (9) and (10), as the reader<br />

may easily verify. Substitution of (9), (10) and (18) into (5) through (7) then yields<br />

r e 1 = i + (1 –t) (v12 1 + v212 + v313 ) (19)<br />

r e 2 = i + (1 –t) (v22 2 + v112 + v323 ) (20)<br />

r e 3 = i + (1 –t) (v323 + v113 + v223 ) (21)<br />

Solving (21) for (1 – t) and substituting the result into (19) and (20), we find that<br />

r e 1 = i + 1 (re 3<br />

r e 2 = i + 2 (re 3<br />

– i) (22)<br />

– i) (23)<br />

where 1 and 2 are defined in (14) and (15). Recall that when portfolios are welldiversified,<br />

we have j → j 3 /2 3 . Thus it follows from (22) and (23) that a shareholder

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!