23.07.2013 Views

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

samlet årgang - Økonomisk Institut - Københavns Universitet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE EFFECT OF THE ’92-REFORM OF THE VERP ON RETIREMENT AGE 173<br />

rence was twice as big at age 66. For age 64 retirement, post benefits were the same at<br />

age 64 and 65, while at age 66, the gap was around 11,000-13,000 DKK per year.<br />

However, irrespective of retirement age, if previous earnings were equal to or below<br />

118,244 DKK (corresponding to 80 percent of the ceiling for VERP benefits), VERP<br />

benefits were the same before and after the reform.<br />

3. Public Employee Pension (PEP, tjenestemandspension)<br />

PEP is available for public servants who are state-employed or employed in the public<br />

school system, the national church, or the Danish Parliament. A public servant is<br />

entitled to PEP from the age of 60, and retirement is mandatory at the age of 70 unless<br />

lower age limits for the job in question are specified. Furthermore, to receive PEP, at<br />

least 10 years of service is required. 12 PEP is the only Danish public sector program<br />

that ties a worker’s benefits to their past record, see e.g. Bingley et al. (2003), that is,<br />

the programs are actuarially adjusted, as there is a reduction in the benefit amount for<br />

retirement before age 67. 13 The reduction depends on the retirement age and the number<br />

of »pension years« accumulated at the point of retirement. 14 »Pension years« refer<br />

to the number of years that a public servant has been employed full-time in public<br />

service from the age of twenty-five. The number of pension years cannot exceed 37.<br />

Instead of receiving old age pensions at age 67, PEP recipients continue to receive<br />

PEP for the rest of their lives.<br />

People entitled to PEP are used as the comparison group to people entitled to VERP.<br />

First, these individuals are not affected by the change in the VERP policy in 1992.<br />

Second, it seems reasonable to assume that the composition of the group of individuals<br />

entitled to PEP is exogenous. Although people could have been jumping between<br />

VERP and PEP, it is unlikely that the composition of the two groups changed due to<br />

the policy changes in 1992 because rules dictate that eligibility to VERP and PEP<br />

respectively is a function of a long labour market history going back in time. Another<br />

objection could be that the comparison group is not pure in the sense that, in addition<br />

to people eligible for PEP, other public employees are also included in this group.<br />

However, the composition of the comparison group is fairly stable over time (see<br />

Table A.1 in the Appendix). Consequently, this group in its entirety seems to be a<br />

suitable comparison group.<br />

4. Data<br />

The data used are obtained from a Danish longitudinal register dataset created for<br />

12. However, particular rules apply to public servants with at least three years of service who leave their job<br />

before the early retirement age.<br />

13. After 1 July 1999, this was changed to age 65 for people born after 1 July 1939. If the mandatory retirement<br />

age is lower than 67 (65), there is a reduction in benefit amount for retirement before this age.<br />

14. After 1 January 1994, the maximum benefit was 57 percent of the wage when retiring.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!