04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Karnataka<br />

restructuring would indeed yield better results with lesser implementation<br />

uncertainties.<br />

AUTONOMY OF RESTRUCTURED COMPANIES<br />

An important objective <strong>of</strong> the reform process <strong>of</strong> the power sector was not only to<br />

invest the utilities with the corporate status, but also to grant them adequate<br />

organisational and functional autonomy to enable them to work independently, with<br />

adequate powers to manage their affairs on a sustainable basis. At the cost <strong>of</strong><br />

repetition, the DPS specifically proposed the grant <strong>of</strong> maximum autonomy to the<br />

restructured companies to manage their business along commercial lines. However,<br />

this has not yet been provided, which is obviously a major impediment to the reform<br />

process. According to the Chairman <strong>of</strong> the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory<br />

Commission (KERC), ‘the restructuring <strong>of</strong> the power sector is a failure since<br />

electricity companies are not functioning independently’ 20 . The extent to which the<br />

restructured companies have achieved functional autonomy could be ascertained from<br />

the following developments.<br />

COMPOSITION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS<br />

(i) Karnataka <strong>Power</strong> Corporation Limited (KPCL)<br />

The Chief Minister <strong>of</strong> the State has traditionally held the position <strong>of</strong> the Chairman <strong>of</strong><br />

KPCL, which was established in 1971. The Board has the Minister for Energy and the<br />

Adviser to the Minister for Energy as members. Six senior bureaucrats, including the<br />

Secretary to the Chief Minister, Principal Secretary (Energy Department) and the<br />

Managing Director <strong>of</strong> KPTCL are also on the Board. There are also four functional<br />

directors.<br />

The composition <strong>of</strong> the Board is indicative <strong>of</strong> the limited autonomy that the<br />

management will have on policy matters, without being hampered by political<br />

interference. The presence <strong>of</strong> the CM and the Minister for Energy on the Board <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Company will not only inhibit free and fair discussions in the Board meetings, but will<br />

also affect its autonomy. Hence, it would be appropriate that the CM and the Minister<br />

must voluntarily step down from Board positions, even if these appointments are<br />

declared as non- pr<strong>of</strong>it positions under the relevant law.<br />

The Board must further be reconstituted by including only up to three Government<br />

(nominee) directors in addition to the functional directors. Government <strong>of</strong> Karnataka<br />

20 Shri K.P. Pande, Chairman, KERC, quoted in The Hindu, dated 26 May, 2006.<br />

3.29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!