04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Synopsis <strong>of</strong> State <strong>Report</strong>s (Vol.-IV)<br />

Study on `Impact <strong>of</strong> Restructuring <strong>of</strong> SEBs’<br />

by the consumers, so that the consumers are discouraged from attempting to<br />

damage and tamper with the meters).<br />

After paying their bill <strong>of</strong> metered connection, they could be allowed a cash<br />

refund on presentation <strong>of</strong> the bills. This can break the resistance <strong>of</strong> the farmers<br />

to meters. Psychologically this can also highlight the extent <strong>of</strong> subsidy, which<br />

the Government is providing to the agricultural consumers.<br />

Table 6.4: Billing and Collection Efficiency (%)<br />

Pre-Restructuring Post-Restructuring<br />

1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003<br />

-96 -97 -98 -99 -00 -01 -02 -03 -04<br />

Billing Efficiency<br />

Domestic 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Industrial 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Agricultural 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

Collection Efficiency<br />

Domestic NA NA 96.49 95.86 95.24 96.86 99.28 97.67 97.14<br />

Industrial NA NA 101.17 100.84 99.66 100.06 101.08 100.63 99.76<br />

Agricultural NA NA 99.94 100.78 96.00 93.15 99.49 93.08 96.00<br />

Even during the pre-restructuring period, 100 per cent billing <strong>of</strong> all the<br />

categories was ensured. That system continues even now. The collection<br />

efficiency level is ranging between 97 to 99 per cent in respect <strong>of</strong> domestic<br />

consumers and 99 to 100 per cent from industrial consumers. In the prerestructuring<br />

period also, collection efficiency ranged between 99 to 101 per<br />

cent. In the case <strong>of</strong> agricultural consumers, the collection efficiency has ranged<br />

from 98 to 100 per cent in the past. This percentage has somewhat declined in<br />

the post-restructuring period. Out <strong>of</strong> four years, the collection efficiency was<br />

93 per cent in two years, 96 per cent in one year and 99 per cent in another.<br />

This is again reflective <strong>of</strong> the s<strong>of</strong>t approach <strong>of</strong> the State Government,<br />

particularly towards the agricultural consumers.<br />

It appears that the State Government has also issued oral directions (November<br />

2002) for suspension <strong>of</strong> recovery <strong>of</strong> minimum charges from agriculturalmetered<br />

consumers. This concession is continuing since then. The financial<br />

burden on the DISCOMs due to this oral direction is estimated to be more than<br />

Rs 300 crore annually. If such a methodology becomes a precedent, it would<br />

open the floodgates for populist decisions by the Government in tariff matters<br />

without any financial liability on the Government.<br />

68

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!