04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Rajasthan<br />

Preventive Action and Prosecutions/Compoundings for Theft <strong>of</strong> Electricity<br />

Particulars<br />

1996<br />

-97<br />

1997<br />

-98<br />

1998<br />

-99<br />

1999<br />

-00<br />

2001<br />

-02<br />

2002<br />

-03<br />

2003<br />

-04<br />

2004<br />

-05<br />

(Rs lakh)<br />

2005<br />

-06<br />

Preventive raids<br />

(No.)<br />

74637 70864 78730 100729 106825 106300 81195 74164 103220<br />

Demand raised 3294.47 4666.76 3541.47 4669.67 6364.36 6022.26 4507.14 4580.20 5690<br />

Penalty amount<br />

recovered<br />

204494 2689.17 2747.64 3601.06 3546.68 3202.74 2530.86 2306.43 2924.4<br />

Prosecuted/<br />

compounded (No.)<br />

8672 13356 17055 22977 1639 1036 518 218 1222<br />

• Through various orders vigilance department has been streamlined.<br />

• Inter sub-division/division and joint checking concept introduced resulting in fresh impetus to<br />

vigilance checking.<br />

• State Government has notified the creation <strong>of</strong> 34 Anti-<strong>Power</strong> Theft Police Stations.<br />

• 15 Anti-<strong>Power</strong> Theft Police Stations have started w.e.f. 1 April 2006.<br />

A look at the four-year period <strong>of</strong> preventive raids for the pre-restructuring period<br />

would show that the number <strong>of</strong> raids substantially increased every year but in the postrestructuring<br />

period, the number <strong>of</strong> raids has significantly reduced year after year<br />

except in the year 2005-06. The number <strong>of</strong> such raids was 74,164 in 2004-05. This<br />

figure was achieved eight years back in 1996-97 (74,637). Almost two lakh new<br />

consumers are added every year and hence, with the increasing number <strong>of</strong> consumers,<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> raids should have also gone up. The number <strong>of</strong> raids was around<br />

1,00,000 up to 2002-03, but in the next two years it has recorded a decline <strong>of</strong> more<br />

than 25 per cent.<br />

The same trend is to be noticed in recovery <strong>of</strong> penalty amount. During the previous<br />

five years, the figure increased substantially every year, so much so that from a<br />

recovery <strong>of</strong> Rs 15.24 crore in the year 1995-96, it rose to Rs 36.01 crore in 1999-2000.<br />

This is more than 100 per cent increase. During the post-restructuring period, the<br />

penalty amount has constantly declined, year after year, so much so that the penalty<br />

amount <strong>of</strong> Rs 35.46 crore in 2001-02 has come down to Rs 23.06 crore in 2004-05.<br />

Incidentally, even seven years back in 1997-98, the penalty amount had reached the<br />

figure <strong>of</strong> Rs 26.89 crore. Penalties are directly related to tariff. Since tariff has<br />

substantially increased during these nine years, even if the same number <strong>of</strong> raids were<br />

organised, the net penalty amount should have been much higher.<br />

In the matter <strong>of</strong> prosecutions/compoundings, the earlier tempo does not seem to have<br />

been maintained. During the pre-restructuring period, the figure had jumped from<br />

1,861 in 1995-96 to 22,977 in 1999-2000. The figure has gone up every year during<br />

those five years. After restructuring, the figure has declined drastically. In 2001-02,<br />

the figure had come down to 1,639. The next four years have maintained a declining<br />

6.25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!