04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

State <strong>Report</strong>s (Vol.-III)<br />

Study on `Impact <strong>of</strong> Restructuring <strong>of</strong> SEBs’<br />

EA, 2003. However, the TRADECO has not applied for “bulk supply” license under<br />

the EA, 2003. This is a grey area as to whether distribution <strong>of</strong> power purchased by the<br />

TRADECO is permissible without license under section 14 <strong>of</strong> the EA, 2003.<br />

8.4 FINANCIAL RESTRUCTURING PLAN AND CASH FLOW MECHANISM<br />

The State Government ownership for the reform is demonstrated by the FRP, which<br />

stipulates the total transition cost involved for the power sector in the State. The State<br />

Government is providing financial support is provided to the tune <strong>of</strong> Rs 6,881 crore to<br />

the DISCOMs. The role <strong>of</strong> the MPSEB has some advantages. However, in actual<br />

practice, it amounts to concentration <strong>of</strong> decision-making with MPSEB in several<br />

areas, which are normally in the jurisdiction <strong>of</strong> the DISCOMs. Since MPSEB is no<br />

longer a licensee now and, therefore, not answerable to the MPERC, there is a<br />

likelihood <strong>of</strong> conflict with the objectives and spirit <strong>of</strong> the EA, 2003. The objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

the CFM and the FRP could be achieved through a holistic approach, which<br />

guarantees prior consultation with the MPERC and control and responsibilities on the<br />

DISCOMs for implementation <strong>of</strong> the FRP and targets.<br />

The FRP has been revised to cover the period from 2006 to 2012. The FRP provides<br />

for the reduction <strong>of</strong> AT&C losses from 50 to 32.5 per cent in a seven years period, i.e.,<br />

around 2 per cent on a yearly basis, which appears to be low. The targets <strong>of</strong> AT&C<br />

losses given in the FRP and those prescribed by the MPERC do not tally. In fact, the<br />

targets prescribed by MPERC are aimed at bringing down the targets so as to come<br />

closer to the target <strong>of</strong> 15 per cent as prescribed in the NTP. In view <strong>of</strong> the above, there<br />

is a fresh need to look for the targets set for AT&C losses in FRP and also those fixed<br />

by MPERC.<br />

8.5 REGULATORY PROCESS<br />

8.5.1 MYT Framework<br />

MPERC is one <strong>of</strong> the few Electricity Regulatory Commissions in the country to issue<br />

MYT order providing a control period with specific efficiency and loss reduction<br />

targets. The AT&C loss reduction roadmap has been fixed for the three DISCOMs,<br />

which gives differential loss reduction trajectory for these DISCOMs. The rationale<br />

appears to be: the geography, past legacy and the extent and nature <strong>of</strong> the problems in<br />

each <strong>of</strong> the DISCOMs.<br />

4.54

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!