04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

State <strong>Report</strong>s (Vol.-III)<br />

Study on `Impact <strong>of</strong> Restructuring <strong>of</strong> SEBs’<br />

(d) High transmission and distribution losses - both technical and commercial;<br />

(e) Non-remunerative tariffs;<br />

(f) Downward trend in industrial consumption and increase in domestic and<br />

agricultural consumption which entailed a high level <strong>of</strong> cross-subsidy;<br />

(g) Inadequate investment in generation, transmission and distribution sectors;<br />

(h) Widening demand-supply gap;<br />

(i) Inadequate maintenance <strong>of</strong> the existing generating stations and transmission and<br />

distribution network resulting in low plant load factor (PLF) <strong>of</strong> generating<br />

stations and poor reliability <strong>of</strong> transmission and distribution network;<br />

(j) Poor billing and collection;<br />

(k) Poor quality <strong>of</strong> service to the consumers;<br />

(l) Manpower related problems; and<br />

(m) Misuse <strong>of</strong> Section 78A <strong>of</strong> the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948 which stipulated<br />

that the Government should provide policy directives to the State Electricity<br />

Boards (SEBs).<br />

Under the provisions <strong>of</strong> the Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948, the State Government had<br />

to ensure three per cent rate <strong>of</strong> return (ROR) on net fixed assets. OSEB was not able to<br />

achieve the same. The subsidy burden on the State Government increased from Rs<br />

14.00 crore in 1989-90 to Rs 257.62 crore in 1995-96, (the last year <strong>of</strong> OSEB).<br />

Although OSEB was incurring heavy losses, huge investments were necessary for<br />

creation <strong>of</strong> additional generating capacity to bridge the demand-supply gap. The State<br />

Government was not in a position to provide the requisite resources to meet the<br />

current as well as future demands <strong>of</strong> the power sector in the State.<br />

FIRST PHASE OF REFORMS<br />

In November 1993, a decision was taken by the State Government to reform and<br />

restructure the power sector in the State. The restructuring process contemplated the<br />

following actions on an emergent and time-bound basis:<br />

Restructuring By separation <strong>of</strong> generation, transmission and distribution functions <strong>of</strong> OSEB.<br />

Private sector Through private sector participation in electricity generation and distribution<br />

participation sectors<br />

Competition Through competitive bidding for new generation projects.<br />

5.2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!