04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

State <strong>Report</strong>s (Vol.-III)<br />

Study on `Impact <strong>of</strong> Restructuring <strong>of</strong> SEBs’<br />

Table: Details <strong>of</strong> Preventive Raids and Demand Raised<br />

(Rs lakh)<br />

Particulars<br />

2000<br />

-01<br />

2001<br />

-02<br />

2002<br />

-03<br />

2003<br />

-04<br />

2004<br />

-05<br />

2005<br />

-06*<br />

Preventive raids (No.) 11411 13890 13319 13999 18904 15647<br />

Demand raised 6191.99 6064.37 3019.4 4369.35 3013.71 1030.52<br />

Prosecuted (No.)<br />

* Till February 2006<br />

308 392 666 1176 1847 1063<br />

Note: (1) Demand raised includes the penalty amount.<br />

(2) For the year 2000-01 to 2002-03 demand raised included the penalty <strong>of</strong> 25 per cent <strong>of</strong><br />

assessed amount.<br />

From the period 10 June 2003 to January 2005, demand raised was on the basis <strong>of</strong> two<br />

times the tariff applicable to the particular category <strong>of</strong> consumer. Further, w.e.f. 20<br />

January 2005, i.e., from date <strong>of</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> MERC Regulation 2005, demand is raised on<br />

the basis <strong>of</strong> 1½ times the tariff applicable to that particular category <strong>of</strong> consumer.<br />

The amount <strong>of</strong> demand raised on account <strong>of</strong> preventive raids <strong>of</strong> Rs 10.30 crore<br />

mentioned above is less than 0.07 per cent <strong>of</strong> the total turnover in the year. From this<br />

it appears that the raids may have been carried out randomly and not on the basis <strong>of</strong><br />

any intelligence gathered from the meter reading data, or targeting consumers from<br />

high loss transformers, or comparison <strong>of</strong> consumption <strong>of</strong> similar type <strong>of</strong> consumers,<br />

etc. In this regard it may be noted that the private utilities treat the meter reading<br />

activity as a value adding activity and make use <strong>of</strong> this information gainfully.<br />

MSEDCL could gain from initiating action on similar lines.<br />

In a separate appendix, MSEDCL have given details <strong>of</strong> the present method <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

accounting process from data collection to final computation. Since reduction <strong>of</strong><br />

distribution losses is the single most important step to improve the financial strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> the utility, some alterations in the method adopted by MSEDCL are suggested for<br />

consideration/adoption with a view to bring quick and more enhanced improvement in<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> losses. These are indicated in chapter ‘Lessons Learnt and Major<br />

Recommendations’.<br />

Financial Health<br />

Following table gives details <strong>of</strong> turnover, PBT, PAT, equity, net worth, Government<br />

subsidy, APDRP incentive, etc.<br />

10.48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!