04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

State <strong>Report</strong>s (Vol.-III)<br />

Study on `Impact <strong>of</strong> Restructuring <strong>of</strong> SEBs’<br />

promised that the share <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan in the unallocated power <strong>of</strong> central generating<br />

stations will not fall below 25 per cent but the average <strong>of</strong> Rajasthan is presently 20.29<br />

per cent only.<br />

Policy on Captive <strong>Power</strong> Generation Before and After the Reforms<br />

Captive generation is not being welcomed by the DISCOMs because they perceive it<br />

as a threat to their revenue. Since the Electricity Act has very much liberalised the<br />

definition <strong>of</strong> captive generation, directly the DISCOMs can do precious little to<br />

check the growth <strong>of</strong> captive plants but indirectly they try to create hurdles. They<br />

are not able to fully meet the power requirement <strong>of</strong> the industries and subjecting them<br />

to frequent power cuts and yet they discourage captive power generation by the<br />

private companies.<br />

A captive power plant (CPP) may have adequate generation capacity for its industrial<br />

unit but for reasons <strong>of</strong> added safety, it would still like to be connected with the<br />

DISCOM system so that it can draw power in case <strong>of</strong> shutdown, annual maintenance,<br />

etc. Such a consumer has to have full contract demand so that he can operate his plant<br />

and machinery in case <strong>of</strong> emergency. The age old minimum charges were conceived<br />

for consumers who were supposed to draw power on regular basis and if they did<br />

not draw power, the DISCOMs rightly charged minimum charges for the system<br />

remaining idle. However, the present scenario is totally different where a<br />

mechanical application <strong>of</strong> the old rules and procedure may lead to gross<br />

injustice. Formerly every consumer would take DISCOM connection for regular<br />

consumption <strong>of</strong> power but the captive plants and open access consumers have no<br />

intention to use the power <strong>of</strong> DISCOMs on a regular basis. Levying the same<br />

minimum charges from an occasional consumer (as for a regular consumer) is<br />

rather too harsh, which deters the growth <strong>of</strong> captive plants and Open Access<br />

consumers. A case has been noticed in Rajasthan where a consumer having a<br />

captive plant <strong>of</strong> more than 150 MW has to shut down his plant for some duration<br />

every month so as to consume power from the DISCOM system equal to the<br />

minimum charges payable by him. This creates double loss <strong>of</strong> power. Firstly, the<br />

generation <strong>of</strong> 150 MW is lost because the captive plant is compelled to shut down.<br />

Secondly, the CPP connected industrial unit draws 150 MW from the DISCOM<br />

system to utilise its minimum charges. Had such a restriction not been in place, this<br />

150 MW could be supplied by the DISCOM to other needy industrial consumers. In<br />

the ultimate analysis, even if minimum charges are not levied from captive plants and<br />

6.42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!