04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

State <strong>Report</strong>s (Vol.-III)<br />

Study on `Impact <strong>of</strong> Restructuring <strong>of</strong> SEBs’<br />

(ii) The repair and maintenance activities undertaken by the DISCOMs leave much<br />

to be desired. Although the Regulatory Commission allows 5.4 per cent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

gross fixed assets (at the beginning <strong>of</strong> the year) to be recovered through tariff,<br />

towards R&M expenses, the distribution companies do not spend the required<br />

sum. This has resulted in inadequate maintenance <strong>of</strong> lines and substations.<br />

(iii) In the business plan, the Regulatory Commission has fixed a benchmark for<br />

reduction <strong>of</strong> distribution loss by three per cent each year till 2007-08. The<br />

DISCOMs are required to achieve this loss reduction. In the event <strong>of</strong> failure by<br />

the DISCOMs to achieve this loss reduction, the investor should come forward to<br />

provide necessary fall-back arrangement/arrange necessary funds to pay to<br />

GRIDCO towards BST dues and other loan repayments. This has not happened<br />

because the investor is unwilling to invest any fresh capital in the sector.<br />

(iv) As on 31 March 2005, the liabilities <strong>of</strong> the DISCOMs were as follows:<br />

• Rs 1,291.99 crore to GRIDCO as outstanding BST dues; and<br />

• Rs 1,535.63 crore towards loan repayment <strong>of</strong> PFC/REC and World Bank<br />

relating to distribution assets transferred to the distribution companies.<br />

GRIDCO being a commercial entity is unable to find ways and means for<br />

payment to the generating companies like NTPC, OHPC and repayment <strong>of</strong> its<br />

loan to financial institutions. The investor should have arranged funds to ensure<br />

liquidation <strong>of</strong> arrear liabilities <strong>of</strong> the DISCOMs to GRIDCO, as the DISCOMs<br />

are unable to repay the dues to GRIDCO from their own income.<br />

(v) During the super cyclone in 1999 there was substantial damage to the<br />

distribution system in the State, specifically in the coastal areas. There was<br />

inordinate delay in rehabilitation <strong>of</strong> the distribution system in the affected<br />

villages. Even today, there are 75 villages in the coastal areas <strong>of</strong> the State, where<br />

electricity distribution network has not yet been restored. This has created<br />

adverse criticism from all concerned about the working <strong>of</strong> DISCOMs as well as<br />

the reform process.<br />

(Bulk <strong>of</strong> the arrear dues in these areas needs to be written <strong>of</strong>f.)<br />

(vi) There is reduction <strong>of</strong> only 10.16 per cent in AT&C losses during 2000-01 to<br />

2004-05 by the distribution companies, which is not up to the mark.<br />

(vii) The entire funding <strong>of</strong> distribution business has been financed through default in<br />

payment <strong>of</strong> monthly BST bills/instalment <strong>of</strong> interest and principal payable to<br />

GRIDCO. In the process, GRIDCO’s financial position has deteriorated<br />

substantially.<br />

5.28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!