Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

2.5.2 Financial Parameters
2.5.2.1 Energy Sold (MUs)
State Reports (Vol.-III)
Study on `Impact of Restructuring of SEBs’
Improved thermal generation during 2004-05 as compared to 2003-04 could be
credited to the improved availability of the plants. However, the increase is not
remarkable as a still higher level of generation was achieved during 2002-03.
Energy sold (MU)
25000
Energy Sold from generating stations
20000
16820.5 17743.4 18628.4
19922.8
15000 16009
17426
13770 14556 15428 15787
12868.2 12851.9
14099 14493.1 14420
10000
11300 12366
10575
11866 12169
5000
2239 2264.5 2315.4 2841.4 2496.8 1568.2 2276.9 1733 2627.1 2251
0
95-96 96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
Hydel Years Thermal Total
2.5.2.2 Cost of Generation
4.30
(Source: MPGENCO)
From 2005-06, the Commission has approved the two-part tariff for State generating
stations. Accordingly it is now possible to distinctly identify the fixed and variable
components of power for the MPPGCL.
Fixed and variable Costs of MPGENCO Thermal Stations (paise/unit)
2.6 OBSERVATIONS/COMMENTS
Thermal Stations Fixed cost Variable cost
Amarkantak TPS 59.8 113
Satpura TPS 27.9 123
Sanjay Gandhi TPS 69 97
( Source: MPGENCO)
• After reorganisation of the erstwhile Madhya Pradesh into Chhattisgarh and the
present Madhya Pradesh, an inverted situation emerged with regard to the
available generation resources and the consumer mix. 33 per cent of the installed
generating capacity went to the State of Chhattisgarh, whereas the level of
consumption was only 21 per cent of the total consumption of undivided Madhya
Pradesh. This has been described by Government of Madhya Pradesh as
irrational and unequal treatment of the power generating assets.