04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Karnataka<br />

Sheet Restructuring Plan provided a total financial support <strong>of</strong> Rs 1,800 crore to the<br />

restructured company (KPTCL) and the second such exercise included the write <strong>of</strong>f <strong>of</strong><br />

KPTCL’s receivables <strong>of</strong> Rs 866 crore. This also aimed to restrict the total subsidy<br />

payable to the sector for the subsequent ten year period to Rs 12,140 crore, exclusive<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rs 1,050 crore taken over towards the long-term debt servicing <strong>of</strong> KPTCL<br />

(erstwhile KEB).<br />

In actual practice, however, the large amount <strong>of</strong> subsidies to the sector continues to<br />

persist, with no respite visible in the near future. The following Table provides the<br />

details <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it, loss, and subsidies to the distribution sector in the recent years:<br />

Year<br />

Table: Details <strong>of</strong> Pr<strong>of</strong>it and Loss<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>it after<br />

tax<br />

(Accrual<br />

basis)<br />

Cash pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

(accrual basis<br />

excluding<br />

depreciation<br />

and write-<strong>of</strong>fs)<br />

3.33<br />

Cash pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

(subsidy<br />

received<br />

basis)<br />

Cash pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

(Revenue and<br />

subsidy on<br />

realised basis)<br />

(Rs crore)<br />

Loss<br />

without<br />

Subsidy<br />

2002-03 340 943 849 103 (1,599)<br />

2003-04 310 1,034 689 412 (1,315)<br />

2004-05 462 1,259 1,092 621 (1,107)<br />

Total 1,112 3,236 3,630 1,136 (4,021)<br />

(Source: PFC)<br />

Thankfully, the extent <strong>of</strong> losses without subsidy has come down from Rs 1,599 crore<br />

in 2002-03 to Rs 1,107 crore in 2004-05, that is by as much as 31 per cent over the<br />

three-year period, which shows significant improvement. However, the gap between<br />

the average cost <strong>of</strong> supply and the average revenue realised continues to vary between<br />

Rs1.30 per unit for HESCOM and Rs 0.06 for BESCOM. Efforts must be continued to<br />

reduce the gap and to gradually eliminate the subsidy by efficient planning, and<br />

measures aimed at increasing revenue and reducing costs.<br />

METERING PROGRESS<br />

Government <strong>of</strong> Karnataka had initiated a three-year programme in 2002-03 for 100<br />

per cent metering <strong>of</strong> all service connections; but this has not succeeded due to severe<br />

resistance from the farmers. According to MESCOM’s Business Plan, the Universal<br />

Metering Plan is a limited success. The Plan states that the metering <strong>of</strong> IP sets in three<br />

districts were completed. Due to resistance <strong>of</strong> farmers, the progress in one division<br />

(Sagar) was only 50 per cent. BESCOM’s metered consumption comes to only 49 per<br />

cent <strong>of</strong> the total sales in 2004-05, though there is marginal increase from the previous<br />

years. HESCOM claims that it has achieved some 87 per cent overall efficiency in

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!