04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CHAPTER - 2<br />

HARYANA<br />

2.1 FACTORS LEADING TO REFORMS<br />

Haryana adopted the restructuring model, based on a study <strong>of</strong> its power sector<br />

in 1995-96. The study recommended comprehensive reforms <strong>of</strong> the electricity<br />

sector in the State. In order to undertake power sector reforms, the State<br />

enacted the Haryana Electricity Reforms Act, 1997. The aims and objectives <strong>of</strong><br />

the said Act included the following:<br />

(a) Creating a financially viable electricity sector;<br />

(b) Creating an environment to attract private investment;<br />

(c) Promoting competition; and<br />

(d) Over all development <strong>of</strong> the electricity sector in an efficient, economical<br />

and competitive manner.<br />

The need for comprehensive reforms was felt since the Haryana State<br />

Electricity Board (HSEB) was finding it increasingly difficult to meet the<br />

demand for power. The State witnessed a peak shortage <strong>of</strong> 11 per cent and<br />

energy deficit <strong>of</strong> around 25 per cent in 1997. No generation capacity was added<br />

in the State. Consequently, the State remained increasingly dependent on power<br />

imported from outside sources.<br />

The situation further deteriorated due to lack <strong>of</strong> adequate funds for expansion<br />

<strong>of</strong> generation, transmission and distribution systems, as HSEB could not<br />

control the cumulative effect <strong>of</strong> inefficiencies and mounting commercial losses.<br />

By March 1998, the accumulated financial losses reached Rs 16,076 million.<br />

These continued to grow on account <strong>of</strong> non-compensatory tariffs, poor revenue<br />

collection and high technical and non-technical losses.<br />

In this background, the State Government initiated the reform process by<br />

restructuring the vertically integrated HSEB. The chronology <strong>of</strong> events in the<br />

reorganisation process is as follows:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!