04.08.2013 Views

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

Report of Indian Institute of Public Administration ... - Ministry of Power

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Andhra Pradesh<br />

2.1 INTRODUCTION<br />

CHAPTER 2<br />

RESTRUCTURING EXERCISE<br />

APSEB was one <strong>of</strong> the well-managed SEBs in the country. It was consistently<br />

earning three per cent rate <strong>of</strong> return (ROR) on net fixed assets till the late<br />

1980s. The financial strain started in the 1989-90, when it achieved only 0.81<br />

per cent ROR. The deterioration in the financial position continued and by the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> 1997-98, the outstanding dues <strong>of</strong> APSEB were the order <strong>of</strong> Rs 2,600<br />

crore. The worsening financial situation <strong>of</strong> APSEB was caused by:<br />

• Increase in the capital costs due to increase in the costs <strong>of</strong> capital<br />

equipment;<br />

• Increase in the running costs due to increase in the costs <strong>of</strong> fuels (coal, oil,<br />

etc.) and transportation charges;<br />

• Increased burden <strong>of</strong> debt servicing;<br />

• Lack <strong>of</strong> political support to allow tariff adjustments to meet the growing<br />

cost <strong>of</strong> supply;<br />

• Introduction <strong>of</strong> slab rate tariff to agricultural consumers in 1982-83;<br />

• Increase in consumption by the agricultural consumers due to the addition<br />

<strong>of</strong> adding new services (<strong>of</strong> the order <strong>of</strong> one lakh or even more every year);<br />

• No flow <strong>of</strong> cash subsidy from the State Government; and<br />

• Rising T&D losses due to inadequate investments in the T&D network<br />

expansion and illegal tapping <strong>of</strong> electricity by the users.<br />

Due to the prevailing financial crisis, APSEB was not in a position to raise<br />

funds for its capital investments. Even the <strong>Power</strong> Finance Corporation (PFC)<br />

and the Rural Electric Corporation (REC) had stopped further lending on<br />

account <strong>of</strong> mounting overdue payments. The Independent <strong>Power</strong> Producers<br />

(IPPs) were facing problems in getting financial closures for their projects<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the weak financial health <strong>of</strong> APSEB, which was conceived as the<br />

sole buyer <strong>of</strong> the power produced by them. The FIs, both national and<br />

international, started insisting on reform and restructuring <strong>of</strong> APSEB as a<br />

precondition for lending support for the capital requirements <strong>of</strong> the power<br />

1.19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!