10.07.2015 Views

epigrammatum anthologia palatina - Notes du mont Royal

epigrammatum anthologia palatina - Notes du mont Royal

epigrammatum anthologia palatina - Notes du mont Royal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CAPUT VII. EPIGRAMMATA SEPULCRALIA. 479« qu.v liilarem luam juventulem abrupit. Duplex accusalirusrcctc habet. » Denique Heckerus :Ai«T, xapOevtxi; dXodppovo; aia' Artd oatSpavfxXaaev AXtxiav ' iuepdeaaa KXeoT,« vocativo ad sequentia relato. Sic ataa fxXaae, OrtfxXaoe,StexXaat, ap. Quintum XI, 88; VI, 13, X, 107. Etquod rcstitui Anacreonti supra ep. 263, 4 : iinv of;v xtjuat'ap' lueprfiv ixXaoev f)Xtxfriv. » — 2 AXtxfav Cod. 8Uperposito>V — 3 xaSSe a' auufaiievai rtepi Saxpuatv aid'Cod. et Plan. Scaligeri est rtcpioaxpuc;, quod ex recentibusmodo scriptoribus affcrtur, et prope invitus posui.Mcinek. neptSdxpuot, sineexemplo. Botbius : « Ilepl perlinetad foraiie;, rtcpteoTauc;. » Heckerus : « Reponcn<strong>du</strong>mputo rtoXuSaxputpato' fxi Tuu6to, coll. ep. 48, 3;476, 3. Vere autem Meinekuis monuit jungen<strong>du</strong>m essexaTa(j.u£d|tevai oe, idque eadem ratione dictum esse quaxdrrceo6ai ttva, pjangere aliquem. » Boissonadius scripsit: xaSSe oe Tcyfeitevat rtepi odxpuotv etc, cum hacanimadversione '• « Correxi, ut vides; lectionem meamnon nt veram obtrudens, sed ea exhibens quaj posscntlegi et inteiligi, donec melius quid reperiatur. Mihi fmgoSirenarum pulrhras statuas quar tumulo in babitu ftentiumerant impositas. » Jacobsius tentaverat 4u|ie; AuulA-[tevat 6i rtapriiSa; atd' etc. : nam « Sixpuotv auuaoetv diciposse nonvidetur; rcapr,t8a; iuuaociv rcctissime dicitur. »— 4 Xie; Cod. «• Memorabile est XS; gcnere femininousurpatum, ut a Nicandro Ther. 43 et Alcxandro /EtoloEleg. I, 31. Sirenes in sepulcro positas babemus iteinap. Erinnam infraep. 710. Conf. Eurip. Hel. 169. » Mein.CDXCII. Lcmma : el; Ta; TpeT; rtapOfvou; Ta; MtXriof»;TOI; Ortd raXaTtov (JtaaOeiaa;. In Plan. est 4Sr,Xov. « Facinorisquod hoc carmine relcbratur mentio fit ap. Hieronvmumin lib. I Adversus Jovinianum p. 180 : Quis valeatsilentio prxterire SEPTEM Milesias virgines qu.c,Gallorum impelu cuncta vastante, ne quid indccensab hostibus sustinerent, turpiludinemmorte fugcrunt.Ccterum hasc Gallorum in Asiam incursio inter prarcipuafabularum Milesiacarum argumenta fuisse videlur; conf.Parlhen. Erot. c. 8. » Jac. Vides iongam famain auxisschcroinarum numcrum. — 1 tiydjieO' Plan.; oiydjicO' Cod.,quod servavit Boiss. — 2 t^v ivottov Plan.; raXdrav Cod.Brunckius TAV A8f|ittrrov TCV Avdptov , quod probant Jac,Meinek. et Hecker. In nott. mss. Jacobs. proponit TWV46eu.ioT6>vrravTdvo|iov V. Pro Avatvdtievai Heck. reponen<strong>du</strong>mcenset aXeu<strong>du</strong>evat, ut infra ep. 561 • AaoSfxr.vSr,tutv uSptv 4Xevo|iivnv, et Append. cp. 276. — 3 tov d Sfa-TO; Cod.,et in marg. : ivri TOU ptatdTOTo;. Plan. S;d fkaord;,Scaliger (Statrrq;, Brunck. pfato; , Jacobs. ptari; (utPindarus), « quaa correctio placuisse videtur viro dortoin Thes. Steph. Did. » B. — 4 4|i;ia T4 8uaae6e;, nefandnsscelestorum hominum amplexus, correctionem Jacubsiirecepit Boiss.; aijia in utroque codice, quod de genlcaccipiebat Jac. « Bectius (inquit Meinek. p. 98) interpreterisde caade a scelestis illis sibi instante. Hanc virginesillee praevertebant sua se manu occidentcs. »Jn PncCod. et Plan. djicvaiou, sed illc in marg. '• yp. Oufvatov.— 6vuu?fov Cod. et Pian., sed iile superscripto vjuifou.Brunck. ouS' Opivatov vuujpiov, sed recte distinxit Jac,confercns ep. 182 ct Soph. Antig. 813. Hecknrus : « Mihialiquid magis reconditum latere videtur in ultiiho disticlio,quod ita scriben<strong>du</strong>m puto :oOS' f |iir,v' 4(1(1' aiua T6 8uaae6e; , ouB' 'Vuevatovvuupfot, 4XX' 'Al8r,v xr|St(idv' etX<strong>du</strong>eOa ,ut in epigr. seq. v. 4. »CDXCIII. Lemma : et; 'Poodr.r.v tr,v 6uyaTe'pa Botoxr,;xal aurf,v Botaxxv Ta; Kopiv6fa;. In Plan. 'AvTirtaTpou,sine gentili. Matcr ct lilia in Corintbi expugnatione,- ntservitutem effugercnt, inortcm sibi ipsaa consciverunt.— 1 poSdrta (superposito T; ) ct potoxr) Cod.; dorira inPlan. — 4 etXdji. Cod. 'AXxtpov, mortcm quie fortes de-Cet. —7 8' fv auyfvtov Setpav Spdyto Cod.; o' fvauyev.ovSetpa Bpdyov Plan.; evauyevtto scripsit Jacobs., quod ailj.boc uno loco lcgi vidctur, nequc apta cst composilio, utanimadvertit Heckerus, cujus einendalio fortasse recipidehebat: iijie 8' ev 4yy ovito Seipiv ppdyto. Deinde Plan.f,v, sed Codex fj; yip A|ieivto (sic), « quod boruin adjectivorumformas ab Zenodoto Homcro impcrtitas in mentemrevocat; v. schol. II. A, 249. » llcck.Plan.—8 4u|ttvCDXCIV. Lemma : el; ItoSajiov TOV Kofjra cv BaXaaoyjTtXtuTTrjavra. In Plan. Athenodoro tribuitur. — 1 2>o6aju;Plan.; u> piXe vtpeuCod.; to tpfXe Nypcu Plan ; Bmnckius;t?:Xa Heckerus. Grotius fv accepisse vidctur : erantin causa vel auctores mortis. — 3 ly8u6oXeu; Cod. —4 OUTI Plan ; ouSi 8. Cod. « Mare <strong>du</strong>m tempestatibus furit,niliil discriminis ponit inter ea quae infestat, ct nepiscatoribus quidem parcit. » Jac.CDXCV. Lemma : ei; 'Aartaotov vauriyov f, Ttva aXXov.« Postrema addidit, quod suspicabatur <strong>epigrammatum</strong>esse <strong>du</strong>orum reliquias : nam in superiore margine novtepaginac, a rersu 3 inchoantis, haec leguntur ; Stt Str-pr;-pevov eupov rd ertiypappaTd iTuyvd; ev 4pxTouptp xaiTO Ou (sic) OTtyet; (sic) rtapa Tup6ov dSotrtdpe.Nec falsa forsan suspicio. » II. — 1 apxToupoov aurato-rtXvo; (sic)Cod., cmcndatum a Plan., qui in fine Bapefr,;.— 2 'Aaxaoiti) rttxpdv iTf.uife pdpov (scil. 4Iri'ApxTouptartXdo;)Plan.; sed Codex ut editum. « Plura tentarunt propterdictionis insolcntiam editores; unus Meinekius p. 159 non{ <strong>du</strong>bitat sanam esse Codiris lectionem, idque omuinorccte; simillimum est enim quod legitur infra ep. 678, 4 :| i; iSixtov Te rtdviov xettifjXtov oOSiv fTeu|a. »I Jfccker. Scd valdc recens hoc epigramma 678. Jacobsiusj in nostro exemplo ct asteriscum verbo fTeutja appositum! delevit et conjecluram suain IXeuoa. Boissonadius fxupoa,| rumhac nota : « Vulgo fxeufa, quod mutavi in fxupoa,melius quid cxspectans. Genitivus rttxpou fxupua TOXOUnon est nccessarius. » Ungerus Beilr. p. 20, rttxpov fn'rjfa uopov, « ut dicitur iioaetv frt' iyydva;, ext ppdyov,frt: lepeta, frci ftXfav » ! — 3 trto|ia Se Tvu6o; Cod., cuisuj:crscriptum rtdvro; et vox tvuveVj; atrameato in<strong>du</strong>cla.— 4 fatvdjievo; Cod.; fatvdpevov Plau.; (Jaidjitvov Brunckius,et sic Jac. iu nostro exemplo; olim conjecerat fae/djievov.Ungerus patvdjievo; refcrebat ad 'Aortiato;, proparcntbesi habcns vcrba ou o-tefyet;... fxpmji'. Credal..CDXCYI. Lemma : et; Ttva vaunydvfv repavefa xai rat;Extporvfat rtcTpat; vauayriaavra. — 1 tote/ev Cod., quodservavit Bcrgkius p. 908; ceteri omnes drpeXe; cum Salmasio.Bupes Geranca inter Megara ct Corintbum sita.saltu Imls nobilitata. In fine Cod. 'lorpov, superscriptoou. Accusativiis rendet ex Apav. — 2 e; Sx. HeringaObss. critt- p. 266, quod probare videtur Jac. in nostrocxemplo. vecepit Sclineidevrin.; fv Ix. Reiskius et Heckerus.Alteruin Jac. intclligebat (TOV) ex Ixu6e'

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!