19.09.2013 Views

Roar Mikalsen - HUMAN RISING - radiofri..

Roar Mikalsen - HUMAN RISING - radiofri..

Roar Mikalsen - HUMAN RISING - radiofri..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

“Until only a few decades ago, the law of the UK treated problematic drugs users for<br />

what they largely were — vulnerable people in need of help. Prohibition now turns<br />

those without substantial means into social outcasts. Large numbers of people,<br />

otherwise law abiding, are being criminalised in a way that has already been<br />

demonstrated to be ‘arbitrary’, and it seems to me in conflict with the principles<br />

underlying the European Charter of Human Rights. (…) If policy on drugs (…) in the<br />

future [is] to be pragmatic not moralistic, driven by ethics not dogma, then the current<br />

prohibitionist stance will have to be swept away as both unworkable and immoral, to<br />

be replaced with an evidence based unified system (specifically including tobacco and<br />

alcohol) aimed at minimization of harms to society. Such a strategy leads inevitably to<br />

the legalisation and regulation of all drugs.” 42<br />

Storbritannia har flere slike politimenn med både mot og forståelse nok<br />

til å ta avstand fra lovgivningen. En annen er tidligere politisjef Tom Lloyd, som<br />

sa dette i et innlegg i the Guardian den 20. september 2009:<br />

“Several generations have now lived under the shadow of the Misuse of Drugs Act<br />

1971, including police officers like me who became increasingly disillusioned with its<br />

effects. Despite all the money and effort poured into the so-called ‘war on drugs,’ the<br />

inexorable spread of drugs and the accompanying damage is powerful testament to<br />

failure. What we are doing is not only very expensive and misdirected activity, but<br />

actively counterproductive and harmful. (…) If the money wasted on misinformation,<br />

low-level enforcement and condemnation had been spent on tackling the underlying<br />

causes, so many blighted lives could have been different. There are other options, but<br />

sadly we cannot hold a rational public debate as serving officers or politicians who<br />

dare challenge the ‘war on drugs’ orthodoxy justifiably fear being pilloried by our<br />

national press.” 43<br />

Som Lloyd er inne på her, prioriterer de fleste politikerne en karriere på<br />

maktens premisser, heller enn å tåle hardt vær for sitt ståsted. Men det finnes<br />

også politikere som har integritet nok til å reagere på det som skjer. Mo<br />

Mowlan var ansvarlig for Blair-regjeringens narkotikapolitikk fra 1999 til 2001.<br />

Dette sier hun selv:<br />

“From my experience of being responsible for drugs policy in the previous government,<br />

I came to the conclusion that legalisation and regulation of all drugs was the only way<br />

to reduce the harmful effects of this unstoppable activity. (…) One of those reasons<br />

(…), is that we need to detach the international drugs business from criminality — not<br />

least because it would further isolate international terrorism by removing the finance<br />

44

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!