Roar Mikalsen - HUMAN RISING - radiofri..

Prohibition, or in a more centralized way, through the active efforts of a few moral
entrepreneurs, as happened with drugs considered illicit today.” Ibid s 63
For mer om narkotikalovgivningens opprinnelse som en rasistisk motivert kontroll
mekanisme, se Dan Russell, Drug War; Covert Money, Power and Policy (Kalyx 2000), s 1-218
276 Robinson & Scherlen, Lies, Damn Lies, And Drug War Statistics (SUNY 2007), s 20.
277 Jacob Sullum, Saying Yes; In Defence of Drug Use (Tarcher/Penguin Books 2004) s 178.
278 Doris Marie Provine, Unequal Under Law; Race in the War on Drugs (the University of
Chicago Press 2007), s 74.
279 Edward Marshall, Uncle Sam is the Worst Drug Fiend in the world, New York Times 11.
Mars 1911.
280 Doris Marie Provine, Unequal Under Law; Race in the War on Drugs (the University of
Chicago Press 2007), s 75.
281 Ibid s 77.
282 Ibid s 76.
283 Denne beslutningen fra 1916, ble reversert i 1919 etter sterkt påtrykk fra
dominanseinteressene, men fortsatt opprettholdt høyesterett at opiatavhengige hadde den
samme rett som andre pasienter til medisinsk behandling. Ibid s 80.
284 Ibid s 82.
285
Edward M. Brecher med flere, The Consumers Union Report - Licit and Illicit Drugs, 1972
kapittel 56. Finnes på druglibrary.org Se
http://druglibrary.org/schaffer/LIBRARY/studies/cu/cumenu.htm
286 Doris Marie Provine, Unequal Under Law; Race in the War on Drugs (the University of
Chicago Press 2007), s 83.
287 Robinson & Scherlen, Lies, Damn Lies, And Drug War Statistics, s 11.
Joseph F Taylor, ledende etterforsker i LAPD, sa dette om cannabis’ effekt på brukerne i
1932: ”We have had officers in this department shot and killed by marihuana addicts and
have traced the act of murder directly to the influence of marihuana, with no other motive.
Numerous assaults have been made upon officers and citizens with intent to kill by
marihuana addicts which were directly traceable to the influence of marihuana.” Jacob
Sullum, Saying Yes; In Defence of Drug Use (Tarcher/Penguin Books 2004) s 201.
449