20.09.2013 Views

Identitet i praktik - Identity in Practice

Identitet i praktik - Identity in Practice

Identitet i praktik - Identity in Practice

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ger repertoire that signalled the difference of the TRB.<br />

Further south, <strong>in</strong> Denmark and Scania, battle-axes of a<br />

different design were produced. In the encounter with<br />

people from the Funnel Beaker Culture of Southern<br />

Scand<strong>in</strong>avia, the divergent design of the Swedish-Norwegian<br />

battle-axes may have served as a reification of a<br />

different k<strong>in</strong>d of Funnel Beaker Culture, of a different<br />

identity.<br />

In the f<strong>in</strong>al part of the thesis the Funnel Beaker Culture<br />

<strong>in</strong> Mälardalen and Bergslagen is compared to other<br />

northern border regions of the TRB complex: western<br />

Central Sweden, South-eastern Norway (Østlandet),<br />

South-western Norway (Vestlandet) and Pomerania and<br />

Chelmno <strong>in</strong> northern Poland. While the archaeological<br />

material from each of these areas displays regional traits,<br />

to an extent they also share a common repertoire with<br />

the reoccurr<strong>in</strong>g artefact types: funnel beakers, polygonal<br />

battle-axes, four-sided polished work<strong>in</strong>g axes, and<br />

subsistence practices that to a larger (Poland) or smaller<br />

(Vestlandet) degree <strong>in</strong>cluded agricultural practices. All<br />

these regions bordered on lands where groups of people<br />

lived that did not share the cultural practices of their<br />

TRB neighbours and – at least <strong>in</strong> Scand<strong>in</strong>avia – did not<br />

practice cultivation nor cattle herd<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

The Early Neolithic archaeological material found <strong>in</strong><br />

the area north of the Funnel Beaker Culture <strong>in</strong> Scand<strong>in</strong>avia<br />

can be classified as Early Neolithic Slate Culture,<br />

rema<strong>in</strong>s from aceramic hunter-gatherers named after the<br />

role slate played <strong>in</strong> the lithic <strong>in</strong>dustry. In north-easternmost<br />

Sweden the Slate Culture bordered on the Comb<br />

Ware Culture (phase II) with a further distribution eastwards<br />

<strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land and neighbour<strong>in</strong>g parts of Russia and<br />

Estonia. While the people of the Slate Culture were hunter-gatherers<br />

without pottery, the people of the Comb<br />

Ware Culture were hunter-gatherers with pottery, and by<br />

292<br />

Fr e d r i k HAllgren<br />

this time ceramics had been <strong>in</strong> use for more than 1000<br />

years by the hunter-gatherers of F<strong>in</strong>land. The northern<br />

local groups of the Funnel Beaker Culture <strong>in</strong> Poland<br />

lived close to the Neman, Zedmar and Narva Cultures<br />

of north-eastern Poland, Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad, Lithuania, Latvia<br />

and Belorussia. These groups are normally considered<br />

hunter-gatherers <strong>in</strong> the archaeological literature, but occasional<br />

bones from domesticated animals are found at<br />

least at Zedmar sites, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that some domesticates<br />

were adopted or circulated to the north of the Funnel<br />

Beaker Culture <strong>in</strong> the region east of the Baltic Sea. Rather<br />

than a border between farmers and hunter-gatherers, the<br />

northern limit of the TRB <strong>in</strong> Poland may be considered<br />

a border between groups with different traditions and<br />

contrast<strong>in</strong>g cultural practices.<br />

In the border zones between such traditions, <strong>in</strong> encounters<br />

with people from different cultural contexts,<br />

unconscious knowledge and dispositions were made<br />

conscious. The cultural specifics <strong>in</strong> one’s own way of<br />

life were made visible, <strong>in</strong>sights that might have played a<br />

role to form an identification with a social context that<br />

went beyond the local. In such a process elements like<br />

shared subsistence practices, shared craft traditions and<br />

shared material culture may have been given mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />

the construction of group identity. The realisation that<br />

some people lived by different lifestyles and practised<br />

other cultural practices may have contributed to articulate<br />

the categories “us” and “them”, identities that<br />

can be understood as examples of ethnicity. Because it<br />

is dependent on the specific circumstances of the encounter,<br />

such an identity is flexible; the same <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />

may identify differently <strong>in</strong> different situations. Still it<br />

is not a random identification, rather an identification<br />

where history, culture and circumstances all contribute<br />

to form<strong>in</strong>g a negotiable cultural identity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!