Identitet i praktik - Identity in Practice
Identitet i praktik - Identity in Practice
Identitet i praktik - Identity in Practice
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ger repertoire that signalled the difference of the TRB.<br />
Further south, <strong>in</strong> Denmark and Scania, battle-axes of a<br />
different design were produced. In the encounter with<br />
people from the Funnel Beaker Culture of Southern<br />
Scand<strong>in</strong>avia, the divergent design of the Swedish-Norwegian<br />
battle-axes may have served as a reification of a<br />
different k<strong>in</strong>d of Funnel Beaker Culture, of a different<br />
identity.<br />
In the f<strong>in</strong>al part of the thesis the Funnel Beaker Culture<br />
<strong>in</strong> Mälardalen and Bergslagen is compared to other<br />
northern border regions of the TRB complex: western<br />
Central Sweden, South-eastern Norway (Østlandet),<br />
South-western Norway (Vestlandet) and Pomerania and<br />
Chelmno <strong>in</strong> northern Poland. While the archaeological<br />
material from each of these areas displays regional traits,<br />
to an extent they also share a common repertoire with<br />
the reoccurr<strong>in</strong>g artefact types: funnel beakers, polygonal<br />
battle-axes, four-sided polished work<strong>in</strong>g axes, and<br />
subsistence practices that to a larger (Poland) or smaller<br />
(Vestlandet) degree <strong>in</strong>cluded agricultural practices. All<br />
these regions bordered on lands where groups of people<br />
lived that did not share the cultural practices of their<br />
TRB neighbours and – at least <strong>in</strong> Scand<strong>in</strong>avia – did not<br />
practice cultivation nor cattle herd<strong>in</strong>g.<br />
The Early Neolithic archaeological material found <strong>in</strong><br />
the area north of the Funnel Beaker Culture <strong>in</strong> Scand<strong>in</strong>avia<br />
can be classified as Early Neolithic Slate Culture,<br />
rema<strong>in</strong>s from aceramic hunter-gatherers named after the<br />
role slate played <strong>in</strong> the lithic <strong>in</strong>dustry. In north-easternmost<br />
Sweden the Slate Culture bordered on the Comb<br />
Ware Culture (phase II) with a further distribution eastwards<br />
<strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>land and neighbour<strong>in</strong>g parts of Russia and<br />
Estonia. While the people of the Slate Culture were hunter-gatherers<br />
without pottery, the people of the Comb<br />
Ware Culture were hunter-gatherers with pottery, and by<br />
292<br />
Fr e d r i k HAllgren<br />
this time ceramics had been <strong>in</strong> use for more than 1000<br />
years by the hunter-gatherers of F<strong>in</strong>land. The northern<br />
local groups of the Funnel Beaker Culture <strong>in</strong> Poland<br />
lived close to the Neman, Zedmar and Narva Cultures<br />
of north-eastern Poland, Kal<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>grad, Lithuania, Latvia<br />
and Belorussia. These groups are normally considered<br />
hunter-gatherers <strong>in</strong> the archaeological literature, but occasional<br />
bones from domesticated animals are found at<br />
least at Zedmar sites, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that some domesticates<br />
were adopted or circulated to the north of the Funnel<br />
Beaker Culture <strong>in</strong> the region east of the Baltic Sea. Rather<br />
than a border between farmers and hunter-gatherers, the<br />
northern limit of the TRB <strong>in</strong> Poland may be considered<br />
a border between groups with different traditions and<br />
contrast<strong>in</strong>g cultural practices.<br />
In the border zones between such traditions, <strong>in</strong> encounters<br />
with people from different cultural contexts,<br />
unconscious knowledge and dispositions were made<br />
conscious. The cultural specifics <strong>in</strong> one’s own way of<br />
life were made visible, <strong>in</strong>sights that might have played a<br />
role to form an identification with a social context that<br />
went beyond the local. In such a process elements like<br />
shared subsistence practices, shared craft traditions and<br />
shared material culture may have been given mean<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong><br />
the construction of group identity. The realisation that<br />
some people lived by different lifestyles and practised<br />
other cultural practices may have contributed to articulate<br />
the categories “us” and “them”, identities that<br />
can be understood as examples of ethnicity. Because it<br />
is dependent on the specific circumstances of the encounter,<br />
such an identity is flexible; the same <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
may identify differently <strong>in</strong> different situations. Still it<br />
is not a random identification, rather an identification<br />
where history, culture and circumstances all contribute<br />
to form<strong>in</strong>g a negotiable cultural identity.