15.02.2015 Views

1PZ2a7xaD

1PZ2a7xaD

1PZ2a7xaD

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

hoffer were ready and awaited Gianese in Lvov, to where<br />

he came to see the building and to sign the agreement for<br />

the execution of mosaic. Mehoffer spent the Easter of 1913<br />

(which fell that year at the end of March) in Venice, overlooking<br />

the production of the mosaics according to his<br />

design. He was paying special attention to the choice of colours<br />

of the tesserae from the famous Murano glassworks,<br />

of which his mosaic was composed. By mid-July 1913 the<br />

mosaic was already in Lvov, and was being prepared for<br />

mounting in the dome. The installation was expected to be<br />

completed within about three weeks, i.e. by the end of August<br />

that year [Figs 88–93].<br />

Mehoffer’ s mosaic in the dome depicts the Holy Trinity.<br />

A mighty bust of God the Father with severe countenance<br />

fills almost entirely the central part of the circular<br />

field, leaving only some space for the Dove of the Holy<br />

Spirit overhead in the clouds, with representations of the<br />

Sun and the Moon flanking God to His right and left, respectively.<br />

The tormented body of Christ reposes against<br />

the Father’ s chest, supported on either side by a kneeling<br />

angel. The prevalent bright tones of blue, pink, ochre and,<br />

above all, gold make an overall pleasant impression, and<br />

the ornaments complementing the scheme are very well<br />

fitted in the space allotted to them on smaller architectural<br />

fragments of the building [Figs 78–86].<br />

The composition was based in essence on the painter’ s<br />

earlier studies of the subject, dating from 1899 [Fig. 79] and<br />

1903 [Fig. 80], to which he returned repeatedly and with<br />

apparent liking over time, and which he only re-worked<br />

for the mosaic picture. That alone would suffice to question<br />

the totally ungrounded remarks appearing in the literature,<br />

maintaining that the ‘Trinity’ allegedly represented an ‘Armenian<br />

type’ of this subject. The composition consists of<br />

the three persons of the Trinity accompanied by two angels.<br />

Just by their presence the composition cannot be identified<br />

with the ‘Throne of Mercy’ (Thronum gratiae). The Lvov<br />

Trinity is much more reminiscent of Albrecht Dürer’ s print<br />

of 1511 (B. 122; Fig. 84), whereas its closest iconographic<br />

counterpart is the composition called Pietas Domini (God<br />

the Father’s Pietà), Pitié de Nostre Seigneur or Notgottes,<br />

popular in the art of western Europe since the end of the<br />

fourteenth and especially in the fifteenth century. But in<br />

Lvov most probably no one explored the iconographic and<br />

theological intricacies of the composition; it was understood<br />

as a representation of the Holy Trinity, at most only<br />

an uncommon one. Nevertheless Mehoffer s Holy Trinity,<br />

despite its obvious relationship with the above-mentioned<br />

iconographic traditions, is a unique and innovative creation<br />

of the painter. What is more, the artist apparently concentrated<br />

rather on the formal qualities of his work than<br />

on its content.<br />

The Remaining Decorations<br />

and Furnishings<br />

According to the general principle of attaining stylistic<br />

uniformity among the heterogeneous parts which form<br />

the cathedral complex, a mosaic was also planned in the<br />

dome of the extension newly added to the church, built by<br />

Mączyński [Figs 40, 99]. This mosaic was mentioned already<br />

in the architect’ s initial design, and hence it can be<br />

assumed that the Archbishop from the very beginning intended<br />

to adorn the ‘Early Christian’ construction of grey<br />

stone with a colourful mosaic. It was apparently due to<br />

financial constraints that a cheaper, yet quite spectacular<br />

solution was chosen: not a mosaic but mural paintings very<br />

plausibly imitating a mosaic. They were executed by a mediocre<br />

painter Antoni Tuch, most probably according to his<br />

own design. So the decoration is technically a painted imitation<br />

of mosaic and from an iconographic point of view<br />

it is a compilation of motifs drawn from the sixth-century<br />

mosaics in the apses of the Ravennian basilicas of San Vitale<br />

(Christ as ‘Cosmocrator’ seated on a globe flanked by<br />

angels) and San Apollinare in Classe (lambs grazing on<br />

a bright green meadow), set beneath the star-studded sky<br />

of the Mausoleum of Galla Placidia, also in Ravenna. The<br />

dome is supported by squinches and features a circular<br />

opening at the top, an oculus, filled with a stained-glass<br />

panel. It was executed around 1909 according to a design<br />

by Karol Zyndram Maszkowski (1868–1938), in Art Nouveau<br />

style. The stained-glass window is composed of a pair<br />

of modules (one depicting a winged cherub and the other<br />

a ‘living’ or ‘flowering’ Armenian cross made of interlacing<br />

ornament) repeated four times in eight panels of the<br />

window [Figs 95–98].<br />

The First World War prevented the plans for the restoration<br />

and modernisation of the cathedral from reaching<br />

completion. Due to the war and the subsequent financial<br />

shortages, it was only in the mid-1920s that the works could<br />

be resumed. They focused on the new furnishings for the<br />

church and on the construction of the chapel of the Holy<br />

Sacrament (adjacent to the sacristy and the northern wall<br />

of the nave). Witold Rawski and Witold Minkiewicz, renowned<br />

architects of the Lvov Polytechnic School designed<br />

the said chapel in the years 1927–1929 [Figs 105–106]. The<br />

latter architect is also responsible for the new disposition<br />

of the church, as well as the main altar, semi-circular balustrade<br />

and the Archbishopric throne [Figs 107–108]. The<br />

furnishings, executed in simple, cubic, modernist forms<br />

belong already to the Art Déco style. White marble used for<br />

the furnishings came from the Russsian Orthodox cathedral<br />

of St Alexander Nevsky which had been torn down in<br />

Warsaw around 1925. At a later date, already in the 1930s,<br />

457

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!