19.11.2013 Views

PIANO MUSIC - Abeille Musique

PIANO MUSIC - Abeille Musique

PIANO MUSIC - Abeille Musique

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Two versions of the fantasy on Les Huguenots have already appeared in this series – the original<br />

version in Volume 50, the final version in Volume 42. The second version, recorded here, is<br />

almost identical to the first except that it allows for a large cut and a smaller one (neither<br />

observed here), and replaces the original frenetic final section with a grand statement of the<br />

Lutheran choral Ein’ feste Burg ist unser Gott – which coda is also adopted in the final version.<br />

In many ways this version is the best text of all, because it allows us the whole duet, which the<br />

final version does not, and yet has the better ending.<br />

In the case of the Sonnambula fantasy, the second version appeared in Volume 50, and the final<br />

one in Volume 42. The present version is the first, although it was announced as a revised version<br />

when it first appeared, simply because the very first edition went out without any dynamics or<br />

other performing directions. The musical texts are otherwise identical.<br />

The Chernomor March from Ruslan i Lyudmila appeared in its final form in Volume 6 – Liszt at<br />

the Opera I. By the time of the revision the language of the title had changed from French to<br />

German, and the text was somewhat simplified. The present version finds some quite different<br />

textures in its various treatments of Glinka’s splendid material, and Liszt’s coda (Glinka’s<br />

original does not have one) is another composition altogether in the later version (which was<br />

further recomposed when Liszt made his version for piano duet).<br />

The Valse à capriccio is that rare specimen of a fantasy upon themes from two different operas<br />

(Liszt also combined Figaro and Don Giovanni – see Vol 30), and in the first version also<br />

contains material at the end which comes from neither of the operas in question: Donizetti’s<br />

Lucia di Lammermoor and his lesser-known Parisina. If the later version, called Valse de concert<br />

(see Vol 30 – issued as the third of Trois Valses-Caprices, along with the final versions of the<br />

Valse de bravoure and the Valse mélancolique – see Vol 1) is a more subtle and refined piece, the<br />

early version contains a good deal of interesting music which was cut in the later piece. (The<br />

revision, however, restored the four bars missing from the F sharp major waltz – reinstated here<br />

by analogy with the corresponding passage eight bars earlier – an error not corrected in any<br />

subsequent publication of the early version.) For listeners familiar with the later version, it will<br />

be easily seen that the two pieces are similar in structure until the point where the first version<br />

breaks into a brisk 2 / 4 variation where the second version proceeds directly to the peroration. In<br />

the first version the waltz is resumed, but in 3 / 8 , and the themes from the two operas are<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!