Small Decentralized Hydropower Program National ... - Cd3wd.com

mecanicamente mas simple, constituye el analisis interactivo,
mediante la intervention humana en la
determination de las instituciones 2.
Es interesante notar, que dentro de1 modelo desarrollado,
la identification y creation de actividades 2,
constituye a su vez actividad, o mas precisamente,
meta-actividad, que forma parte de la funcidn de
COO~~T~~~~~~, d-u-ante ia etapa de programacion.
El resultado de la meta-activldad indicada, es la extension
de las cadenas de relaciones, que constituyen
el programa; mediante la inclusion de instituciones 2.
La continuation de las cadenas, mediante el enlace
de instituciones 1 o inditiduos ejecutores, a las instituciones
2, puede efectuarse algoritmicamente, con
una base adecuada de information.
La consideracidn de1 mecanismo presentado, es
didactica, en el presente contexto, por dos motivos,
primero, destaca la naturaleza diferente de 10s dos
componentes institucionales, dentro de1 sistema de
soporte de un programa. Grkficamente, puede
representarseles coma nodos, a las instituciones, 1 y
segmentos, a las instituciones 2, conformando una
red (Figura 4). Segundo, propone un modelo, esquematico,
de1 proceso de analisis de1 disefio institucional
de un programa, coma base para la discusion
de akernativas.
/ Actividad A /
/Institution IA r‘
stitutions 2. A more simple form constitutes an
analysis of human interactions to identify institu-
tions 2.
It is noteworthy that identification and creation
of activities 2 also constitute an activity, or more
precisely, a meta-activity. This is part of the coor-
dination function during the programming phase.
The result of the meta-activity described is the
branching out of relationship chains, which con-
stitute the program, through inclusion of institu-
tions 2. The continuation of the chains by linking
institutions 1 or implementing individuals ‘to in-
stitutions 2 can be performed algorithmically, if
there is an adequate data base.
Consideration of the mechanics presented is
didactic for two reasons: first, the nature of the
differences between the two institutional com-
ponents is highlighted within the support system
of a program. Graphically institutions 1 may be
represented as nodes and institutions 2 as
segments, constituting a grid (Figure 4); second,
it proposes a schematic model of the analysis
process for institutional design of a program as
an alternative discussion base.
/Institution 1” / /Institution 1Z /
Figura 4 Red Instituciunal
Figure 4 Institutional Network
254