Small Decentralized Hydropower Program National ... - Cd3wd.com

general de la zona probable a ubicarse la mini-
central hidroelectrica.
A mayor pendiente (menor longitud de
canal?) y topogrsa difGl, se asignara mayor
puntaje. Este es un criterior tecnico-
econbmico.
3. Poblacion Beneficiada
Peso: X3
El puntaje sera variable entre 1 y 10 de
acueredo a la poblacion, segCm rangos.
Este criteria tiene el caracter social de
preferir a 10s sitemas en el cual se beneficie a
mayor cantidad de habitantes no obstante que
se incrementan las perdidas economicas en la
operacidn debido al alto costo de la energfa
-frente a las tarifas vigentes.
4. Densidad Poblacional
Peso: X4
El puntaje sera variable de acuerdo al rango
de habitanteslkmz, de 1 para mini-regiones de
baja densidad, a 10 para aquellas de mayor
densidad.
Este criteria es economico debido a que
mini-regiones de mayor densidad requeriran
menor longitud de lineas de subtransmisibn y
de redes de distribuci6n.
5. Demanda de Potencia
P-,so: x5
El puntaje variable de 1 a 10 correspon-
diendo mayores puntos a las miniregiones de
mayor demanda, debido a que a mayor deman-
da, el costo de la energia es menor y se brinda
servicio a mayor nlimerio de habitantes,
6. Existencia y tipo de Gas de acceso a la mini-
region.
Peso: x6
El puntaje variara de 1 a 10 segcin el tipo de
las tias de acceso; otorg&ndose mayor puntaje
a 10s proyectos que tengan acceso mediante
mejores tias.
Se asume miniregiones con acceso con me-
jores tias. tienen un mejor nivel economico.
7. Existencia de Servicio de Agua Potable
Peso: X7
El puntaje variable de 1 a 10 segCn el
ndmero de poblaciones con servicio de agua,
correspondiendo mayor puntaje a las mini-
regiones con mayor numero de poblaciones
con servicio.
Este es un criteria economico, pues se puede
aceptar que las poblaciones con servicio de
303
(shorter length of the canal) and more dif-
ficult topography, a higher score should be
assigned. This is a technical economic
criterion.
3. Population Benefited
Weight X3
The score will vary between 2 and IO
depending on the population range. This
criterion has a social character. It gives
preference to the systems which would
benefit a higher number of inhabitants,
even though the economic losses in the
operation are increased due to the high
cost of energy in view of the existing tariff.
4. Population Density
Weight X4
The score will vary according tc the
range of inhabitants lkm2, from 1 for mini-
regions of low density to 10 for those of
highest desnity. This criterion is economic
in nature due to the fact that mini-regions
of higher density will require shorter sub-
transmission lines and a smaller distribuion
grid.
5. Energy Demand
Weight X6
The score will vary from 1 to IO, the
highest scores going to mini-regions of
greater demand, due to the lower cost of
energy and the fact that service is provided
to a larger number of people.
6. Existence and type of access roads to the
mini-region
Weight X6
The score will vary from 1 to 10 depen-
ding on the type of access roads, assigning
higher scores to the projects that have ac-
cess through better roads. It is assumed
that mini-regions with better access roads
have a higher economical standard.
7. Existence of Drinking Water Service
Weight X7
A score from 1 to 10 will be assigned
with higher scores to communities having
water service, the higher scores will go to
mini-regions with a larger population with
water service. This is an economic criterion
since it is assumed that communities hav-
ing water service are at a higher economic
level and have a higher probability of pay-