15.04.2013 Views

NetBackup 4.5 Troubleshooting Guide for Windows - Symantec

NetBackup 4.5 Troubleshooting Guide for Windows - Symantec

NetBackup 4.5 Troubleshooting Guide for Windows - Symantec

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>NetBackup</strong> <strong>4.5</strong> <strong>Troubleshooting</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Windows</strong><br />

General Test and <strong>Troubleshooting</strong> Procedures<br />

Example 5: Server Connects to Multiple Networks<br />

The network in this example (see the next figure) shows a <strong>NetBackup</strong> server<br />

(jupter/meteor) that has two Ethernet connections and clients in both networks. The<br />

server’s hostname is mars on one network and meteor on the other.<br />

The first thing to note about this configuration is that the <strong>NetBackup</strong> policy client list<br />

specifies jupiter as the client name <strong>for</strong> the master server. The list could show either jupiter<br />

or meteor but not both.<br />

Another important item to note is the configuration of the <strong>NetBackup</strong> server list.<br />

The <strong>NetBackup</strong> server list on the master server has entries <strong>for</strong> both jupiter and meteor.<br />

The reason <strong>for</strong> both names is that when the server does a backup, it uses the name<br />

associated with the client it is backing up. For example, it uses the meteor interface when<br />

backing up pluto and the jupiter interface when backing up mars. The current server<br />

entry (master server name) is jupiter because that is the name used to back up the client on<br />

the master server.<br />

The <strong>NetBackup</strong> server list <strong>for</strong> the other systems also have entries <strong>for</strong> both the jupiter and<br />

meteor interfaces. This is recommended in order to keep the server entries the same on all<br />

clients and servers in the configuration. It would be adequate to list only the<br />

master-server name <strong>for</strong> the local network interface to the client system or media server<br />

(<strong>for</strong> example, meteor <strong>for</strong> pluto).<br />

For the network shown, the differences mentioned <strong>for</strong> the policy client list and the server<br />

list is the only unique configuration required. Assuming that all the standard networking<br />

files (<strong>for</strong> example, the hosts file, WINS, DNS, and routing tables) are set up correctly, all<br />

required network connections can be made.<br />

If the master server system is a type of router that hides the name of the originating host<br />

when routing requests between networks, you see the same type of restore problem<br />

discussed in example 4. For example, if pluto were on FDDI (token ring), the master<br />

server would use meteor as the peername when it <strong>for</strong>warded the request to <strong>NetBackup</strong>.<br />

<strong>NetBackup</strong> would then interpret the request as coming from a host named meteor, which<br />

was not in the client list, and the restore would fail.<br />

The solution, in this case, is also identical to that discussed in “Example 4: Clients in<br />

Multiple Networks” on page 36.<br />

38 <strong>NetBackup</strong> <strong>Troubleshooting</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> - <strong>Windows</strong> NT/2000<br />

<strong>NetBackup</strong> <strong>4.5</strong> <strong>Troubleshooting</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Windows</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!