Untitled

saxelmwifo enis swavlebis sakiTxebi:
problemebi da gamowvevebi
Issues of State Language Teaching;
Problems and Challenges
. Subordinate clauses of adverbial modifier of cause:
“I have recollected and reminded you only because / that in you I bury the whole non-existed happiness”
:Galaktioni., I, 187.
“May be because that by the sail of the ship, with secret sorrow... the heart can’t manage it in no
case”: Galaktioni ,IV, 215.
“This is because, that/ by rude feeling,/ not suddenly/ gradually/ is dragging the cradles”: Galaktioni
,XI, 234.
“They tried to declare all Georgian Catholics as the Armenian Catholics, only because that some of
them used to go to the Armenian Churches for praying”: Galaktioni, XII, 43.
Subordinate clauses of adverbial modifiers of purpose:
“I want to write only about the subject and because the subject and I don’t want to write only for that to
write: Galaktioni, XII, 12.
“He used to look from beneath at the women walking down the stairs. May be because that to see the
naked knees of woman: Galaktioni, XII, 309.
“That is why , let’s quickly, that is why let’s quickly step forward”: Galaktioni, III, 417.
“The fate have separated me from your sorrow, you because Leonora does not prohibit to wear:
Galaktioni, II, 453.
Observation of formal structure of the sentences shows that the semantic loading (we mean the initial
meaning) of the correlates “because”//”that is why is considerably weakened and it, as a lexical segment , is
of neutral function, what we couldn’t say about its syntactical function – be an indicative word in the
principle clause on which should be built a contextual-grammar structure of the subordinate clause. As
it is seen, correlatization of the principle clause, i.e. mounting it with a correlate, is rather strong coordinator
in the process of modeling of complex sentence and losing it is a difficult thing for the language to adapt.
The matter is that from the syntactic point of view, the lingual process has gone rather far that it is possible
to imagine at first glance. In particular, expressing of differences of contents of cause and purpose is not satisfied
only by the balanced lexico-syntactic joining and their interrelations; The borders are more wider and
among the syntactic accents one of the decisive role has a morphological form of verb-predicate of the sentence.
It is evident that in constructions, in which the verb of subordinate clause comprises the suppositional -
probable, i.e. conjunctional content (under this function mainly are used the forms of the II conjunctive and
the II [turmeobiTi] –Perfect of European languages, by all means it is expressed the purpose and not – the
cause; But if the predicate of the subordinate clause is given in the indicative mood, we deal with the structure
expressing the cause. Fort illustration it is enough to review the any example for the case to be sure in a told
fact. Now let’s consider the combinations which are admissible in compound sentences from the sense of expressing
the contents of cause and purpose.
The versions of the adverbial clauses of purpose within the limits of one sentence:
He wants to sleep may be because that he gets up early (Present – indicative mood);
He wanted to sleep may be because that he used to get up early (uninterrupted-indicative mood);
He went to sleep probably because that he had gotten up early (interrupted – indicative mood);
He has fallen asleep probably because that he had gotten up early (I [turmeobiti] (Perfect) - indicative mood).
During the semantic-syntactic running the power of introduction of essential change, as we have indicated,
will be imposed on the form expressing the conjunction of the verb-predicate of subordinate clause while the
correlate will remain unchanged (it has no sense any more its change) and the content of the cause will be
shifted by the content of purpose:
393