30.01.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

saxelmwifo enis swavlebis sakiTxebi:<br />

problemebi da gamowvevebi<br />

Issues of State Language Teaching;<br />

Problems and Challenges<br />

Ramaz Kurdadze<br />

Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Georgia<br />

Towards the Common Rule of Forming one Type of Derivatives in the Georgian<br />

and English Languages<br />

ABSTRACT<br />

The present work deals with the verb formation and typological similarities of one type of<br />

word formation in the Georgian and English languages. The consideration of these issues<br />

will in a way simplify the teaching of Georgian as a second language for English speaking<br />

students.<br />

Teaching Georgian as a second language has a long history. There are special textbooks and methodological<br />

instructions dedicated to this direction. However, not all issues have been relevantly researched yet and<br />

many areas of teaching Georgian grammar require further development in this respect. This becomes particularly<br />

clear when we consider the role of foreign students’ language in the process of teaching Georgian as a<br />

second language. Showing the typological similarities between Georgian and learner’s native language is particularly<br />

interesting.<br />

The issues shown in our work are related to the methods of teaching the second language. Through<br />

providing one specific typological example the work presents the issues that should be considered by a teacher:<br />

how to explain the theoretical material and turn it into the basis of practical exercises while teaching Georgian<br />

as a second language.<br />

It’s a common fact that the analysis of typological similarities is given a particular importance while<br />

teaching the second language. The similarities demonstrated between the native language and the target language<br />

can significantly simplify the language teaching.<br />

Our work has been designed for English speaking students. We cover common rule of forming one type<br />

of derivatives in Georgian as well as in English language and believe that it will clarify and simplify the comprehension<br />

of the examples of Georgian word formation. At the same time we consider the fact that besides<br />

the English speaking students aiming to learn practical Georgian language there are also linguist students for<br />

whom typological analysis of the Georgian language bear a particular importance.<br />

The subject of our analysis, the samples of word formation, are derivatives of verb origin in both English<br />

and Georgian languages. This fact itself is very interesting in terms of teaching Georgian as the second language<br />

since, as we have mentioned earlier, there are interesting typological similarities in the rule of processing<br />

verb forms between Georgian and English languages.<br />

We would like to begin the analysis of the above mentioned derivatives from the typological similarities<br />

between Georgian and English verb forms since these derivatives are based on certain types of verb forms in<br />

both languages.<br />

Any language has its own principle for grouping verb forms. Despite belonging to different language<br />

families, Georgian and English show certain typological similarities while classifying verb forms. Namely, we<br />

have in mind the circumstance, that vowel alternation in both languages should’ve occupied the leading position<br />

at the earlier stage of development. We mean ablaut alternation of stem vowel.<br />

Ablaut in Georgian, like in the Indo-European languages, bears morphonological functions. It is used to<br />

form different morphological categories; therefore this type of vowel alternation is functionally equal to affixes.<br />

Accordingly, different stages of ablaut together with main morphemes (affixes) can be discussed as additional<br />

morphemes to form certain morphological categories (Gamkrelidze, Machavariani, 1965, 175-179).<br />

397

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!