Untitled
Untitled
Untitled
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
saxelmwifo enis swavlebis sakiTxebi:<br />
problemebi da gamowvevebi<br />
Issues of State Language Teaching;<br />
Problems and Challenges<br />
superessive version (situation): daac ers (writes on the); T5 – marked with the indirect object marker: misc ers<br />
(will write to him); KV – causative verbs: ac erinebs (makes him write), aḳetebeninebs (makes him do) and so<br />
on....<br />
II conjugation – so called dynamic passives (Passive Verben):<br />
Absolute forms (one-person forms): P1 – with morpheme -i (iniani): ic ereba (is being written), ibadeba (is<br />
born) and others; P2 – with the marker d (doniani) – tetrdeba (gets white), saxeldeba (is named), – berdeba<br />
(grows old) and so on; P3 – with no marker (ebiani) – ḳvdeba (is dying), šreba (dries up) and others.<br />
Relative forms (two-person verb forms) RP1 -eniani: emaleba is hiding from him), eṗareba (is creeping to<br />
him); RP2 – with indirect object marker: scildeba (separates from), sǯerdeba (makes do from); RP3 – objective<br />
version forms: ušavdeba: (it gets black for him) and others; RP4 – with situation marker: ašreba (dries up on<br />
him) and others.<br />
III conjugation – medium voice active verbs (so called medioactives) (MV - Mittelverben): cocxlobs (lives,<br />
is alive), mefobs (reigns), ḳamatobs (argues)…<br />
Relative: RMV1 – with indirect object marker : sdaraǯobs (guards), RMV2 – objective version: uγimis<br />
(smiles to him, ugalobs (sings to him) ; RMV3 – superessive version (situation): adgas (stands over smth);<br />
RMV4 – with e marker (eniani): ec vis (it burns, he has burning), esmis.<br />
IV conjugation – static passive verbs (so called situation passives – Zustandspassiva): ZP1 – neutral<br />
version: c eria (is written here), agdia (is lying) and so on; ZP2 – objective version: uc eria (it is written – he has<br />
written); ZP3 – superessive situation: ac eria (it is written on the), axaṭia...<br />
V conjugation – so called inverted verbs (or indirect verbs – Indirekte Verben): IV1 – with indirect object<br />
marker: sӡuls (hates); IV2 – objective vesion: uq vars (loves); IV3 – with situation marker: axsendeba (remembers),<br />
agviandeba (is late); IV4 – passive with e marker: (ra) exumreba – (what makes him) joke.<br />
Sequence of material delivering is also the central issue. First, type I and II series forms of the Georgian<br />
verbs are discussed in this textbook, and then, on the higher level of teaching – inverted forms, objective person<br />
markers and III series forms.With the indirect verbs the author dicusses in details the nature of inversion, subjectobject<br />
grammatical and semantic inerrelations, and at the end he gives detailed analysis verbs of peculiar<br />
conjugation or so called verbs of altered stems (aris, akvs, hq avs, zis, modis – is, has, sits, comes).<br />
Listing of series forms (mwkrivi forms) goes on the traditional way but in the present tense group (according<br />
the author’s terminology – I tense group– I Zeitgruppe) does not contain two circles and the forms or mwkrivis<br />
are matched as follows:<br />
a. Präsens – present, b. Futurum – Future,<br />
c. Imperfekt – Continuous, d. Konditionalis – Imperfect (“xolmeobiti”),<br />
e. Konjunktiv -Conjunctive I: Präsens Konjunktiv I – a. Present conjunctive;<br />
Futurum Konjunktiv – b. Future conjunctive<br />
Kita Tschenkéli thoroughly implemented the principle of indexation of the Georgian verbs in the large<br />
Georgian-German Dictionary, which is the direct and organic part of this textbook. The type of conjugation in<br />
accordance with the above listed symbols and the verbs are arranged based on the nesting principle (in<br />
accordance with their roots, version and causation), which was at that time an innovation in the Georgian<br />
lexicography.<br />
In the preface to the Dictionary, the author remarks: „It was most important to find a new way to show the<br />
peculiarities of the Georgian verb, by means of which the verb could be not only analyzed in a comprehensive<br />
way, but this could be done efficiently. The fame of the Georgian Language spread as difficult to study, having a<br />
complex verb system, thus lighting up this labyrinth was necessary“ (Tschenkéli, 1960-1965, p. XIX-XX).<br />
Kita Tschenkéli proves why it is not appropriate to chose the infinitive as an initial form in the dictionary<br />
and to arrange verb foms on its basis. He gives some reasons: masdar does not have any version, active and<br />
passive forms, their personality is not distinguished, impossibility for derivating conjugation forms, absence of<br />
corresponding masdar for some verbs (Tschenkéli, 1958, 1, p. 623-628).<br />
“Georgian Concise Grammar” by H Fähnrich was first published in 1986. The Georgian verbs are divided<br />
into four types in this book: 1. Transitive active verbs; 2. Passive verbs (with -i marker: igliǯeba -(tears up),<br />
ingreva (breaks down); with -d marker : c itldeba (gets red), paṭaravdeba (diminishes); with -eb marker: tbeba<br />
(gets warm); 3. Intransitive active verbs: mušaobs (works); and 4. Verbs of perception: uq vars (loves), sӡuls<br />
(hates). The author discusses also the other types of the verbs: denoting natural phenomena: c vims (rains), civa (it<br />
403