30.01.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

saxelmwifo enis swavlebis sakiTxebi:<br />

problemebi da gamowvevebi<br />

Issues of State Language Teaching;<br />

Problems and Challenges<br />

superessive version (situation): daac ers (writes on the); T5 – marked with the indirect object marker: misc ers<br />

(will write to him); KV – causative verbs: ac erinebs (makes him write), aḳetebeninebs (makes him do) and so<br />

on....<br />

II conjugation – so called dynamic passives (Passive Verben):<br />

Absolute forms (one-person forms): P1 – with morpheme -i (iniani): ic ereba (is being written), ibadeba (is<br />

born) and others; P2 – with the marker d (doniani) – tetrdeba (gets white), saxeldeba (is named), – berdeba<br />

(grows old) and so on; P3 – with no marker (ebiani) – ḳvdeba (is dying), šreba (dries up) and others.<br />

Relative forms (two-person verb forms) RP1 -eniani: emaleba is hiding from him), eṗareba (is creeping to<br />

him); RP2 – with indirect object marker: scildeba (separates from), sǯerdeba (makes do from); RP3 – objective<br />

version forms: ušavdeba: (it gets black for him) and others; RP4 – with situation marker: ašreba (dries up on<br />

him) and others.<br />

III conjugation – medium voice active verbs (so called medioactives) (MV - Mittelverben): cocxlobs (lives,<br />

is alive), mefobs (reigns), ḳamatobs (argues)…<br />

Relative: RMV1 – with indirect object marker : sdaraǯobs (guards), RMV2 – objective version: uγimis<br />

(smiles to him, ugalobs (sings to him) ; RMV3 – superessive version (situation): adgas (stands over smth);<br />

RMV4 – with e marker (eniani): ec vis (it burns, he has burning), esmis.<br />

IV conjugation – static passive verbs (so called situation passives – Zustandspassiva): ZP1 – neutral<br />

version: c eria (is written here), agdia (is lying) and so on; ZP2 – objective version: uc eria (it is written – he has<br />

written); ZP3 – superessive situation: ac eria (it is written on the), axaṭia...<br />

V conjugation – so called inverted verbs (or indirect verbs – Indirekte Verben): IV1 – with indirect object<br />

marker: sӡuls (hates); IV2 – objective vesion: uq vars (loves); IV3 – with situation marker: axsendeba (remembers),<br />

agviandeba (is late); IV4 – passive with e marker: (ra) exumreba – (what makes him) joke.<br />

Sequence of material delivering is also the central issue. First, type I and II series forms of the Georgian<br />

verbs are discussed in this textbook, and then, on the higher level of teaching – inverted forms, objective person<br />

markers and III series forms.With the indirect verbs the author dicusses in details the nature of inversion, subjectobject<br />

grammatical and semantic inerrelations, and at the end he gives detailed analysis verbs of peculiar<br />

conjugation or so called verbs of altered stems (aris, akvs, hq avs, zis, modis – is, has, sits, comes).<br />

Listing of series forms (mwkrivi forms) goes on the traditional way but in the present tense group (according<br />

the author’s terminology – I tense group– I Zeitgruppe) does not contain two circles and the forms or mwkrivis<br />

are matched as follows:<br />

a. Präsens – present, b. Futurum – Future,<br />

c. Imperfekt – Continuous, d. Konditionalis – Imperfect (“xolmeobiti”),<br />

e. Konjunktiv -Conjunctive I: Präsens Konjunktiv I – a. Present conjunctive;<br />

Futurum Konjunktiv – b. Future conjunctive<br />

Kita Tschenkéli thoroughly implemented the principle of indexation of the Georgian verbs in the large<br />

Georgian-German Dictionary, which is the direct and organic part of this textbook. The type of conjugation in<br />

accordance with the above listed symbols and the verbs are arranged based on the nesting principle (in<br />

accordance with their roots, version and causation), which was at that time an innovation in the Georgian<br />

lexicography.<br />

In the preface to the Dictionary, the author remarks: „It was most important to find a new way to show the<br />

peculiarities of the Georgian verb, by means of which the verb could be not only analyzed in a comprehensive<br />

way, but this could be done efficiently. The fame of the Georgian Language spread as difficult to study, having a<br />

complex verb system, thus lighting up this labyrinth was necessary“ (Tschenkéli, 1960-1965, p. XIX-XX).<br />

Kita Tschenkéli proves why it is not appropriate to chose the infinitive as an initial form in the dictionary<br />

and to arrange verb foms on its basis. He gives some reasons: masdar does not have any version, active and<br />

passive forms, their personality is not distinguished, impossibility for derivating conjugation forms, absence of<br />

corresponding masdar for some verbs (Tschenkéli, 1958, 1, p. 623-628).<br />

“Georgian Concise Grammar” by H Fähnrich was first published in 1986. The Georgian verbs are divided<br />

into four types in this book: 1. Transitive active verbs; 2. Passive verbs (with -i marker: igliǯeba -(tears up),<br />

ingreva (breaks down); with -d marker : c itldeba (gets red), paṭaravdeba (diminishes); with -eb marker: tbeba<br />

(gets warm); 3. Intransitive active verbs: mušaobs (works); and 4. Verbs of perception: uq vars (loves), sӡuls<br />

(hates). The author discusses also the other types of the verbs: denoting natural phenomena: c vims (rains), civa (it<br />

403

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!