30.01.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

with e- marker;<br />

3. medium verbs<br />

– III conjugation<br />

4. static passive<br />

– IV conjugation<br />

5. indirect verbs<br />

– V conjugation<br />

saxelmwifo enis swavlebis sakiTxebi:<br />

problemebi da gamowvevebi<br />

Issues of State Language Teaching;<br />

Problems and Challenges<br />

3. intransitive active<br />

verbs<br />

b. dynamic passive;<br />

c. static passive;<br />

d. reflexive verbs;<br />

4. verbs of perception<br />

5. irregular verbs 3. indirect verbs<br />

– III type<br />

406<br />

3. inverted verbs<br />

(subject in Dative case)<br />

– III diathesis<br />

As we can see in the classifications by Kita Tschenkéli and Heinz Fähnrich, the first three groups are<br />

identical. The only difference is that in the verbs with e (eniani) H. Fähnrich considers e to be the marker of the<br />

indirect object. As for classifications by L. Abuladze and Schtefi Khotivari-Jurgen, Prof. D. Melikishvili, according<br />

which the basis for grouping the verbs is their morphological structure as well as their semantic construction,<br />

founds both on the theory of diatheses. This theory allows to place so called medio-active verbs in the first group<br />

and inverted verbs – in the second group.<br />

The discussed works testify once again to the importance of the correct classification and consequential system<br />

for the foreigners in their studying of the Georgian verb conjugation.<br />

It can be said that the willingness of the authors of the German-language textbooks and reference books of<br />

the Georgian language is undoubtful. It is clear that they try to make it easy for the foreign learners to learn the<br />

Georgian language through separating basic types of the Georgian verbs. Each work is remarkable and the<br />

practical experience of the teaching process should be generalized. Some authors’ opinions may seem disputable<br />

for now, but this does not reduce the importance of their works.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

ABULADZE & LUDDEN (2006) – Abuladze, L. & Ludden, A., 2006, Lehrbuch der georgischen Sprache,<br />

Helmut Buske Verlag GmbH, Hamburg.<br />

CHOTIWARI-JÜNGER et al (2010) – Chotiwari-Jünger, St. & Melikischwili, D. & Wittek, L., 2010,<br />

Georgische Verbtabellen, Helmut Buske Verlag GmbH, Hamburg.<br />

DIRR (1904) – Dirr, A., 1904, Grammatik der modernen georgischen Sprache, Wien und Leipzig.<br />

FÄHNRICH (1986) – Fähnrich, H., 1986, Kurze Grammatik der georgischen Sprache, Verlag<br />

Enzyklopädie Leipzig.<br />

TSCHENKELI (1958) – Tschenkéli K., 1958, Einführung in die georgische Sprache, Bd. 1: Theoretischer<br />

Teil; Bd. 2: Praktischer Teil (Chrestomathie, Texte, Übungen), Zürich, Amirani-Verlag.<br />

TSCHENKELI (1960-1965) – Tschenkéli, K., 1960-1965, Georgisch-Deutsches Wörterbuch, in 26<br />

Lieferungen, Zürich (Switzerland), Amirani-Verlag.<br />

TSCHENKELI (1965-1974) – Tschenkéli, K., 1965-1974, Wörterbuch der georgischen Sprache, 3 Bd,<br />

Zürich.<br />

http://www.kartuli.net/verben.html

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!