Untitled

saxelmwifo enis swavlebis sakiTxebi:
problemebi da gamowvevebi
Issues of State Language Teaching;
Problems and Challenges
He will sleep may be because (//for) that he had to get up early (II conjunctional);
Or:
He will sleep may be because (//for) that he had to get up early ;
Will be of the same type:
He goes to the microphone because that to express his idea.
He will print the letters for him because it will win a name for him,
Power of expressing the purpose has the II [turmeobiti] (Perfect of European languages) as well.
He has behaved thus because that to be seen by other.
He came to the microphone because he wanted to express his idea.
The letters were printed because to win the name for him;
and others.
In the Georgian grammar literature it has been noted, that “The mood of the [turmeobiti] (Perfect of European
languages) is usually indicative. But it is frequent its usage instead of the III conjunctional as well: It is
used for transmission of such action which had not been a fact, but which was supposed as a condition for
other action. In this case its mood is not an indicative, but conditional and the element of the act (separation) is
not in the form any more “ (Shanidze, 1980, p.222). In Georgian language transmission of the conjugational
content by the II[turmeobiti] (Perfect of European languages is one of the main characteristics of the series
and it within the limits of one form together with the indicative mood shares the morphological form of the
predicate. The fact is that the syntactic structure of subordinate clause of adverbial modifies of purpose can’t
exist without the forms expressing the conditional, suppositional- probable content and complex, as a whole
while modeling of the sentence undertakes the special syntactic accent; Though it should be said as well that
in such a case the grammatical possibility of the main sentence and its correlate, their lingual potential fulfills
the function of coordinating function of syntactic-semantic element and it manages the form of the verbpredicate
of the subordinate clause. Semantics of the purpose in subordinate clause determines the suppositional
action expressed by the verb and by it he fixes the admissibility of probability of its execution by the
teller- and will the planned purpose fulfilled? – Thus is
considered the logic of subordinate complex of adverbial modifier of purpose by the lingual semantic, and it
fixes to syntactic for an indicated content – applies to conjunctional form in subordinate clause.
Monosemantically it is clear, that the Georgian language has its own steady established structure
of expression of purpose which is conditioned by relationship (junctionality) of the verb of the subordinate
clause of equalled
verb-predicate. It is the fact that this factor of word combination has such a strong syntactic possibility, that
the process – of shifting /mixing of correlates (we mean displacement of correlates of purpose with the correlates
of cause) both in oral and writers language is running without pain and today in colloquial
speech, the statistics of using of indicative adverb of “Because” under the function of purpose, supposedly
exceeds at some extent the usage of correlates “for that”// because. E.g.:
Last year I left for England because to make a report.
Or:
I have dug the land very thoroughly because to take good potatoes (or, in order to bring good potatoes): etc..
Of course the indicated process becomes the cause of mixing of the interrogative words in interrogative sentences;
Why are you leaving? – For doing the case (i.e. in order, because to do the things); it should be: Why
do you go? – to do the things ( Or for doing the things).
It should be told that such a case of functional redistribution from the diachronic point of view is not the
only one in the case of the Georgian language, e.g., the word “So as “ indicating the historical time today expresses
the cause. F. Ertelishvili writes: “The composition of this adverb is simple; [ra-khan] [khan] here
means the [khan] (period) “the time”; That is, if initially the adverb [rakhan] were the indicator of time, it had
a synonymic meaning of the adverb [rotsa, rodesats] (when) …In middle Georgian it acquires the meaning of
the adverb of cause, and sometimes it is even difficult to distinguish under what function is it used in the sen-
394