11.12.2012 Views

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Jelena Filipović: LANGUAGE POLICY AND PLANNING IN STANDARD ...<br />

the ‘command and control model’ of language management, but on concepts and<br />

ideas of complexity theory, in which language management becomes replaced by<br />

language leadership.<br />

3. Language policy and complexity theory<br />

Management is a term borrowed from engineering and management sciences, and<br />

it is defined as planning, controlling and coordinating activities in order to achieve a<br />

set of objectives by following a number of well-defined procedures. It presupposes<br />

the presence of a manager (or a number of managers) whose role is to direct and<br />

control the people they manage in order to successfully complete a certain task.<br />

In complexity theory 3 , however, management is replaced by leadership,<br />

which is<br />

128<br />

(…), an amorphous phenomenon that has intrigued us since people began organizing,<br />

(and which) is being examined now for its relational aspects. (…) there<br />

are more and more studies on partnership, followership, empowerment, teams,<br />

networks, and the role of context. (…) Ethical and moral questions are no longer<br />

fuzzy religious concepts but key elements in the relationship any organization has<br />

with colleagues, stakeholders, and communities. (Whitley 2004: 13-14)<br />

Leadership is based on trust and solidarity, while management relies on institutionalized,<br />

formalized positions of power within the organization’s hierarchy<br />

(Faucher, Everett, Lawson 2008: 7).<br />

In order to provide a more comprehensive outlook of an alternative theory<br />

and method of language policy and planning based on complexity theory, it is<br />

necessary to further discuss some of its concepts. Until the second half of the<br />

20 th century positivist methodological models dominated all spheres of scientific<br />

research. Objectivity of research procedures and definition of universal, permanent,<br />

unchangeable laws and theories was the principal objective of all activities<br />

in natural and technical sciences on the one hand, and in social sciences and humanities<br />

on the other (Bondarenko 2007). A series of new discoveries, primarily<br />

in natural sciences, such as physics and chemistry, and discovery and research of<br />

dissipative structures 4 by Nobel Prize laureate in chemistry Ilya Prigogine have<br />

shed new light on the overall organization of all living systems:<br />

3 “Complexity science introduces a new way to study regularities that differs from traditional science.<br />

Traditional science has tended to focus on simple cause-effect relationships. (…) Complexity<br />

science posits simple causes for complex effects. (…) Complexity thery, or complexity studies, is an<br />

inclusive term that admits multiple ways of knowing” (Phelan 2001: 130; 135).<br />

4 Dissipative structures are defined as ordered structures which are created out of complex, seemingly<br />

unpredictable interactions among large numbers of elements (Bondarenko 2007: 40). Dissipation<br />

is here understood as a more general term, as a view of reality as a product of thought, action

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!