11.12.2012 Views

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Stathis Efstathiadis: SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY REVISITED<br />

6. Conclusion<br />

This paper has tried to examine, in a selective manner, some instances of ambiguity<br />

in English as these are manifested (chiefly) at the syntactic level. Within<br />

general linguistic theory, the discussion of ambiguity (along with other related<br />

processes) is justified not so much on the grounds that it is of some major significance<br />

in itself, but because an explicit account of such phenomena has triggered<br />

off the extension of linguistic theories and the positing of grammars that claim<br />

to be more highly valued than those in existence till recently, grammars that are<br />

capable of handling such phenomena more satisfactorily. In particular, it has been<br />

shown that language structure cannot any longer be accounted for satisfactorily<br />

by enumerating the rules for a mere linear concatenation of linguistic elements,<br />

but that a variety of layers (‘deep’, ‘intermediate’, ‘high/low’, ‘surface’) must be<br />

given recognition in an explanatory theory of language.<br />

In connection with language acquisition, it has been hinted (though not really<br />

elaborated) that for a native speaker (or for a proficient foreign learner) who<br />

is unaware of all the meanings of a potentially ambiguous form, this form is unambiguous.<br />

This fact has important behavioural and pedagogical repercussions.<br />

As regards the phenomenon itself, the discussion finds justification to the<br />

extent to which it shows (i) that there is no regular one-to-one correspondence between<br />

sound and meaning in English, and (ii) that ambiguities are observed whenever<br />

two potential messages may fail to be distinguished formally on the surface.<br />

Finally, the claim that ambiguity is a fortuitous and altogether unpredictable<br />

language phenomenon has been refuted here by showing that it is systematic<br />

whenever there is constructional homonymy.<br />

SELECTED RELEVANT BIBLIOGRAPHY<br />

Atlas, Jay David (1989). Philosophy without Ambiguity: A Logico-linguistic Essay.<br />

Oxford : Clarendon Press.<br />

Bloomfield, Leonard (1933). Language. New York : Henry Holt and Company.<br />

Chomsky, Noam (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA : MIT<br />

Press.<br />

Chomsky, Noam (1974). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation.<br />

In: Steinberg and Jacobovitz (eds), 183-216.<br />

Chomsky, Noam (1976). Reflections on Language. London : Temple Smith.<br />

Crystal, David (1997). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics. 4 th ed. Oxford<br />

: Blackwell.<br />

Efstathiadis, Stathis (1978). Instances of ambiguity. In: The Faculty of Philosophy<br />

Yearbook, vol. 17. Thessaloniki : Aristotle University Press, 91-111.<br />

318

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!