11.12.2012 Views

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Stathis Efstathiadis: SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY REVISITED<br />

314<br />

(18) (i) Criminals hide (themselves) and this fact will offend the law. or<br />

(ii) People hide criminals and this fact will offend the law. or<br />

(iii) Criminals hide others (e.g. other criminals) and this fact will<br />

offend the law. 11<br />

4.3.2 Other related nominal transforms may be systematically ambiguous, as in<br />

(19) Avoid infection by killing germs.<br />

People like eating apples.<br />

where the difference in the ambiguities involved in the sentences demonstrated<br />

above is explained by the differently marked items “kill” (used both transitively<br />

and intransitively) and “eat” (used only transitively).<br />

The notion of transitivity is also apparent in the Greek sentence<br />

(20) Ο Γιάννης βάφει τα παπούτσια του κάθε μέρα.<br />

interpreted as either<br />

(20a) (i) “John polishes his shoes every day” or<br />

(ii) “John gets his shoes polished every day”<br />

depending on whether βάφει is seen transitively or causatively.<br />

4.3.3. Notice also the systematic ambiguity exhibited by the superficial structure<br />

the+V-ing+of+NP (gerundivised V-ing):<br />

(21) The shooting of the colonels pleased the people.<br />

which is paraphrasable as either<br />

(21a) (i) Someone shot the colonels and this pleased the people. or<br />

(ii) The colonels shot someone and this pleased the people.<br />

4.3.4. It should be noted at this point that gerundivisation of a verb is not the only<br />

nominalised element that may cause systematic ambiguity; This can be seen in:<br />

(22) (a) The foreman’s suspension was a great surprise at the factory.<br />

(b) The secretary is the person to consult.<br />

Disambiguating sentences containing the string V-ing+N can be done in any of<br />

the ways discussed in previous sections.<br />

4.3.5. Relativisation + Deletion<br />

When relativised clauses undergo a deletion transformation, whereby they are<br />

reduced to (relative) prepositional phrases, the result is systematic ambiguity,<br />

11<br />

This is in addition to the lexical ambiguity brought about by the homonymous item “hide” meaning<br />

to “conceal” and to “beat”.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!