11.12.2012 Views

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

Примењена лингвистика у част Ранку Бугарском - Језик у

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

JEZIK U UPOTREBI / LANGUAGE IN USE<br />

impossible to introduce changes into the standard language corpus, but rather as a<br />

de facto language planning which is defined through emergent language behavior<br />

in interested communities of practice and which follows and adapts to shifts and<br />

changes in social structures, cultural models and overall world views. Language<br />

management thus becomes replaced by language leadership in heterarchically<br />

organized communities of practice in which the role of a leader can be assumed<br />

by any member of the community, unlike the role of language managers who are<br />

defined by their institutionalized positions in the social academic and political<br />

hierarchy within the society. It is my strong belief that such language policy and<br />

planning within the existing standard languages provides a much clearer account<br />

of the structure of our societies, as well as of the relevance of communicative<br />

functions and needs which make our language interactions meaningful. In other<br />

words, as stated by Wheatley, Frieze (2006), it is not necessary to persuade all the<br />

speakers of a given standard language at the same time to adopt certain minor or<br />

major adaptations into the linguistic variety they regard as a national monument.<br />

We need to work on establishing critical relationships and interactions which<br />

bring us closer to other individuals who share our world views, our understanding<br />

of knowledge and science, and who also share our faith in the objectives we<br />

decide to accomplish. That is the only way for the new standard language systems<br />

to emerge: to create language forms and communicative practices that are aligned<br />

with new, different or alternative social, cultural, political and other needs. If and<br />

when those forms and structures become part of the standard language, this new<br />

language might make a more profound impact on all aspects of our social and<br />

private lives.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Bauman, Richard, Charles L. Briggs (2003). Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies<br />

and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge : Cambridge University<br />

Press.<br />

Bondarenko Pisemskaya, Natalia (2007). El lenguaje y la teoría del caos. Opción,<br />

Año 23, No. 53: 38-51.<br />

Bugarski, Ranko (2005). Jezik i kultura. Beograd : Biblioteka XX vek.<br />

Corning, Peter A. (2002). The re-emergence of ‘emergence’: A venerable concept<br />

in search of a theory. Complexity 7(6): 18-30.<br />

Faucher, Jean-Baptiste P. L., André M. Everett, Rob Lawson (2008). A complex<br />

adaptive organization under the lens of the LIFE model: The case of Wikipedia.<br />

Paper presented at: The Fourth Organizational Studies Summer<br />

Workshop: “Embracing Complexity: Advancing Ecological Understand-<br />

133

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!