18.07.2014 Aufrufe

Leadership-Interview-Transkript - Sozialpsychologie - Goethe ...

Leadership-Interview-Transkript - Sozialpsychologie - Goethe ...

Leadership-Interview-Transkript - Sozialpsychologie - Goethe ...

MEHR ANZEIGEN
WENIGER ANZEIGEN

Erfolgreiche ePaper selbst erstellen

Machen Sie aus Ihren PDF Publikationen ein blätterbares Flipbook mit unserer einzigartigen Google optimierten e-Paper Software.

element of people oriented, enablement and empowerment, very self-motivated structures<br />

around that. So you can do both, and I think that is at the core of all the learning after Douglas<br />

McGregor. It is all about the combination of the one element with the other element. What<br />

makes military leaders – the good ones – so successful, is because they care so much about<br />

the people in their organization. They know: If we make mistakes as leaders, people will die.<br />

And in a military environment, it is not like in sports or in business, where you want to win<br />

21:20, and you still win, right. No, no, you want to win 21:0. No casualties on your side, you<br />

do not want to write letters home saying ‘your husband’ or ‘your wife’, ‘we lost them,<br />

because of mistakes we made in the field, in the organization, in the strategy, in the way we<br />

lead’, right. So I think, if we look at it more deeply, and I grew up in the military, there where<br />

you care the most, you will have the most of success. If you care and add the analytical and<br />

methodical strength to execute, you actually have the best of both worlds. And I think the<br />

future of great leadership is combining that in the best possible manner. And maybe an<br />

additional answer: That will be different, situation by situation by situation, yes. But it will<br />

have both.<br />

Rolf van Dick: What you are describing is also I think the modern, latest research on, say,<br />

transformational leadership. Leaders need to be able to both work with transactions, paying<br />

people or rewarding and punishing people for good or bad performance, and on top of that be<br />

considered, provide a vision, etc. Now, you can obviously also care for the wrong cause. So,<br />

which role do values play for deciding which is actually really good leadership or not? I<br />

mean, we see so many leaders of the banks at the moment, during the financial crisis, that<br />

have been good leaders because the banks have made large profit, but obviously whether they<br />

are really good leaders is at least a question…<br />

Patrick Cowden: A very relevant question. Especially the last three years, five years, maybe.<br />

You know, I call it the ‘phase of extreme capitalism’, we are gone very far on the capitalistic<br />

principles, of shareholder value, and doing anything it takes to maximize that principle. And I<br />

think it went the wrong way. I think most of the world would say it went the wrong way. But<br />

the question really gets back to the point of, you know, what is underlying all these systems,<br />

that really makes the difference. And I am with you – the method is on the one side, the<br />

process is on the one side, and then the emotional leadership on the other side, emotional<br />

intelligence. What everyone forgets is, what is underneath that. We do not talk about that so<br />

often. We talk about transformational energy, we talk about organizational energy. I was just<br />

in St. Gallen recently, with Heike Bruch, and talked a little bit about those pieces. I think what<br />

we forget is underneath that we talk values, underneath that we talk beliefs. And we neglect<br />

those two layers of organizational and transformational process. And because we neglect<br />

those layers, we get into problems a lot faster, because when you neglect something you do<br />

not talk about it, and when you do not talk about it, it is not a conscious element of your<br />

leadership structure, your leadership culture, and your leadership style. So what I believe is<br />

that the underlying element is what I call ‘belief’. It is believing in yourself as a leader,<br />

believing in your team, and believing in the purpose. If you do not believe in it, you may not<br />

know what it is. If you have got the wrong purpose, everything you do afterwards – it will be<br />

going the wrong path, right. So I think it is really important as a leader to get back to the<br />

basics of the fundamental beliefs that bind the organization together. It starts with yourself,<br />

extends to the team in the organization, and has a lot to do with the purpose. Only after that<br />

can you start talking about values. What are the values, that connect all the people in the<br />

organization together, that are bound to those beliefs. And those values, you know the words<br />

are integrity, and sincerity, and honesty, and openness, we say that a lot, but do we actually do<br />

it every day and in every interaction we have? So I think those two pieces, Rolf, you are very<br />

right, they are so fundamental, but they are so neglected in the discussions that we have and

Hurra! Ihre Datei wurde hochgeladen und ist bereit für die Veröffentlichung.

Erfolgreich gespeichert!

Leider ist etwas schief gelaufen!