19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecovery has been made possible by injecting CO2 into oil wells and by using<br />

down-hole electrical pumps, to allow oil to be produced when the reservoir<br />

pressure is insufficient to force the oil to the surface.<br />

Although costs have risen sharply in recent years (see Chapter 12), much of the<br />

world’s remaining oil can still be produced at costs well below current oil prices.<br />

Most major international oil companies continue to use a crude oil price<br />

assumption of $25 to $35 per barrel in determining the financial viability of<br />

new upstream investment. This conservative figure by comparison with current<br />

high oil prices partly reflects caution over the technical risks associated with<br />

large-scale projects and the uncertainty associated with long lead times and the<br />

regulatory environment.<br />

The current wave of upstream oil investment is characterised by a heavy focus<br />

on such projects, involving the development of reserves that were discovered in<br />

the 1990s or earlier. Unless major new discoveries are made in new locations,<br />

the average size of large-scale projects and their share in total upstream<br />

investment could fall after the end of the current decade. That could drive up<br />

unit costs and, depending on prices and upstream-taxation policies, constrain<br />

capital spending. Capital spending may shift towards more technically<br />

challenging projects, including those in arctic regions and in ultra-deep water.<br />

The uncertainties over unit costs and lead times of such projects add to the<br />

uncertainty about upstream investment in the medium to long term.<br />

Implications of Deferred Upstream Investment<br />

In light of the uncertainties described above, we have developed a Deferred<br />

Investment Case to analyse how oil markets might evolve if upstream oil<br />

investment in OPEC countries over the projection period were to increase<br />

much more slowly than in the Reference Scenario. This could result from<br />

government decisions to limit budget allocations to national oil companies or<br />

other constraints on the industry’s ability or willingness to invest in upstream<br />

projects. For the purposes of this analysis, it is assumed that upstream oil<br />

investment in each OPEC country proportionate to GDP remains broadly<br />

constant over the projection period at the estimated level of the first half of the<br />

current decade of around 1.3%. This yields a reduction in cumulative OPEC<br />

upstream investment in the Deferred Investment Case vis-à-vis the Reference<br />

Scenario of $190 billion, or 25%, over 2005-2030. Upstream investment still<br />

grows in absolute terms.<br />

Lower oil investment inevitably results in lower OPEC oil production. This<br />

is partially offset by increased non-OPEC production. Higher oil prices<br />

encourage this increased investment and production in non-OPEC<br />

countries. They also cause oil demand to fall relative to the Reference<br />

Scenario. Higher prices for oil and other forms of energy also reduce GDP<br />

Chapter 3 - Oil Market <strong>Outlook</strong><br />

107<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!