19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

With the exception of China (where stringent fuel economy standards have<br />

been enacted) and, to some extent, Brazil, most developing countries’ new<br />

light-duty vehicle sales over the projection period will be dominated by<br />

proven technologies that are widespread in the OECD. The marked cost<br />

advantages of adopting new vehicle fuel economy improvements in these<br />

circumstances keep the payback period short. Developing countries, on<br />

average, have payback periods for transport efficiency measures ranging from<br />

one to five years. With its stringent standards, China is the exception: its<br />

payback periods are the longest among non-OECD countries and range<br />

from four to five years. However, the net benefits to China of reduced oil<br />

imports have led decision-makers to accept the slightly longer payback<br />

periods.<br />

necessitate intervention to overcome the problem of financing initial capital<br />

requirements.<br />

Barriers to Investment in End-Use <strong>Energy</strong> Efficiency<br />

Compared with investment in supply, end-use efficiency improvements in the<br />

transport, industry, commercial and residential sectors involve many more<br />

individual decision-makers and a much greater number of individual<br />

decisions. Financing comes from the private sector or the consumers<br />

themselves. The most effective way of encouraging investment in energyefficiency<br />

improvements in these circumstances is well-designed and<br />

well-enforced regulations on efficiency standards, coupled with appropriate<br />

energy-pricing policies (<strong>World</strong> Bank, <strong>2006</strong>a). In most cases, buying more<br />

efficient energy-consuming equipment would bring a net financial benefit to<br />

the consumer, at least over time. However, it is highly unlikely that an<br />

unregulated market will deliver least-cost end-use energy services. Market<br />

barriers and imperfections include:<br />

� <strong>Energy</strong> efficiency is often a minor factor in decisions to buy appliances and<br />

equipment.<br />

� The financial constraints on individual consumers are often far more severe<br />

than those implied by social or commercial discount rates or long-term<br />

interest rates. The implicit discount rate in the services sector may be as high<br />

as 20%, compared with less than 10% for the public sector and 4% to 6%<br />

for long-term interest rates.<br />

� Missing or partial information regarding the energy performance of end-use<br />

equipment or energy-using systems.<br />

� A lack of awareness regarding the potential for cost-effective energy-savings.<br />

210 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong> - THE ALTERNATIVE POLICY SCENARIO<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!