19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

HLW disposal is more contentious than disposal of lower-level wastes and no<br />

country today has an operating disposal site for high-level waste. Though wide<br />

technical consensus exists on the adequacy of geological disposal of HLW, it has not<br />

yet won general public consent. In some countries, however, there are volunteer<br />

communities to host repositories. Table 13.7 provides examples of strategies to deal<br />

with HLW. The search for politically acceptable solutions continues.<br />

Proliferation and International Conventions<br />

Effective safeguards against nuclear weapons proliferation are required as long<br />

as nuclear technologies generate, or can be used to generate, weapons-grade<br />

fissile material, irrespective of whether the material is designated for use in<br />

nuclear power plants, medical, agricultural or other peaceful applications. At<br />

the centre of the international non-proliferation regime is the Treaty on the<br />

Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT), signed in 1970 and extended<br />

indefinitely in 1995. To advance the goal of non-proliferation, the Treaty<br />

established a system of safeguards under the responsibility of the IAEA.<br />

Recent events have shown that the NPT needs to be further strengthened.<br />

Improvements required involve enhanced verification and inspection through<br />

the universal adoption of the so-called “Additional Protocol”, and possibly<br />

restrictions on the use of weapon-usable material (plutonium and high enriched<br />

uranium) in civilian nuclear programmes. The processing of such material and<br />

the production of new material through reprocessing and enrichment could be<br />

limited to international centres, under appropriate rules of transparency, control<br />

and assurance of supply on a non-discriminatory basis, under strict IAEA<br />

control. The Global Nuclear <strong>Energy</strong> Partnership (GNEP), recently proposed by<br />

the United States, and the offer by the Russian Federation to set up a global<br />

network of nuclear fuel cycle services (supply of enriched fuel and recovery of<br />

used fuel) are concepts designed to enhance transparency and control over<br />

sensitive nuclear fuel cycle facilities and would go a long way towards<br />

strengthening the non-proliferation regime. The International Project on<br />

Innovative Nuclear Reactors and Fuel Cycles (INPRO) and the Generation IV<br />

International Forum (GIF) are technology-related efforts further to reduce<br />

nuclear proliferation risks and better to address the problem of radioactive waste.<br />

Other components of the international non-proliferation regime include<br />

verification and development of proliferation-resistant technology, export<br />

controls on nuclear and nuclear-related material and equipment, the<br />

creation of nuclear weapons-free zones, controls against illicit trafficking of<br />

nuclear material and the physical protection of nuclear installations.<br />

Safeguards development will need to keep pace with the expansion of<br />

nuclear power.<br />

Chapter 13 - Prospects for Nuclear Power 357<br />

13<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!