19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

200 EJ (4 800 Mtoe) of biomass production based on perennial crops could be<br />

developed at a cost of $2 per GJ (Hoogwijk et al., 2005; Rogner et al., 2000).<br />

In total, biomass potential from all sources could be as high as 1 100 EJ (over<br />

26 000 Mtoe), though a more realistic assessment based on slower rates of<br />

improvement in yields is 250 EJ to 500 EJ (6 000 to 12 000 Mtoe). A<br />

mid-range estimate of 400 EJ would require about one-fifth of the world’s<br />

existing agricultural land to be turned over to biomass energy production,<br />

equal to about 8% of the world’s surface land area. <strong>World</strong> biomass energy<br />

production in 2004 amounted to about 50 EJ (1 170 Mtoe). Soil, water and<br />

nutrient constraints would reduce this potential.<br />

These estimates are sensitive to assumptions about crop yields and the amount<br />

of land that could be made available for the production of biomass for energy<br />

uses, including biofuels. Critical issues include the following:<br />

� Competition for water resources: Although the estimates cited above<br />

generally exclude irrigation for biomass production, it may be necessary<br />

in some countries where water is already scarce.<br />

� Use of fertilizers and pest control techniques: Improved farm<br />

management and higher productivity depend on the availability of<br />

fertilizers and pest control. The heavy use of fertilizer and pesticides could<br />

harm the environment.<br />

� Land-use: More intensive farming to produce energy crops on a large<br />

scale may result in losses of biodiversity. Perennial ligno-cellulosic crops<br />

are expected to be less pernicious than conventional crops such as cereals<br />

and seeds. More intensive cattle-raising could also be necessary to free up<br />

grassland currently used for grazing.<br />

� Competition with food production: Increased biomass production for<br />

biofuels could drive up land and food prices, with potentially adverse<br />

consequences for poor households. On the other hand, rising prices could<br />

benefit poor farmers.<br />

The share of the world’s arable land used to grow biomass for biofuels is<br />

projected to rise from 1% at present to 2.5% in 2030 in the Reference Scenario<br />

and 3.8% in the Alternative Policy Scenario, on the assumption that biofuels<br />

are derived solely from conventional crops (Table 14.7). The amount of arable<br />

land needed in 2030 is equal to more than that of France and Spain in the<br />

Reference Scenario and to that of all the OECD Pacific countries – including<br />

Australia – in the Alternative Policy Scenario. If second-generation<br />

technologies based on ligno-cellulosic biomass were widely commercialised<br />

before 2030, arable land requirements could be much less per unit of biofuels<br />

output. In a Second-Generation Biofuels Case, ligno-cellulosic based<br />

technologies are assumed to be introduced on a large scale, pushing the share<br />

of biofuels in transport demand globally to 10% in 2030 compared with 5%<br />

414 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong> - FOCUS ON KEY TOPICS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!