19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Demand-Side Investment<br />

Additional demand-side investment in the Alternative Policy Scenario<br />

amounts to $2.4 trillion (Table 8.2). 3 Of this, investment in transport increases<br />

by $1.1 trillion, close to half of the total additional demand-side investments<br />

for all sectors worldwide. Investment in the residential and services sectors<br />

(including agriculture) is more than $920 billion higher than in the Reference<br />

Scenario, while industry invests an extra $360 billion.<br />

Table 8.2: Additional Demand-Side Investment in the Alternative Policy<br />

Scenario*, 2005-2030 ($ billion in year-2005 dollars)<br />

OECD Non-OECD <strong>World</strong><br />

Industry 210 152 362<br />

of which electrical equipment 121 74 195<br />

Transport 661 415 1 076<br />

Residential and services 622 304 926<br />

of which electrical equipment 546 212 758<br />

Total 1 492 872 2 364<br />

*Compared with the Reference Scenario.<br />

Consumers in OECD countries, where the capital cost of more efficient and<br />

cleaner technologies is high, need to invest $1.5 trillion, two-thirds of the<br />

additional global investment in end-use equipment. The share of additional<br />

demand-side investment that occurs in non-OECD countries ranges from<br />

33% of the global total of $926 billion in the residential and services sectors to<br />

42% of the total of $362 billion in the industrial sector. These smaller shares<br />

are a result of the generally lower capital cost of the end-use technologies<br />

applied in developing and transition countries (Box 8.2).<br />

3. The estimates of capital costs for end-use technology used in this analysis are based on the<br />

results of work carried out in co-operation with a number of organisations, including the UNEP<br />

Risoe Centre on <strong>Energy</strong>, Climate and Sustainable Development, the European Environment<br />

Agency (EEA, 2005), Centro Clima at COPPE/UFRJ, the Indian Institute of Management, and<br />

the <strong>Energy</strong> Research Institute in China. We are particularly grateful to Argonne Laboratory in the<br />

United States for its support to part of this analysis through the AMIGA model (Hanson and<br />

Laitner, <strong>2006</strong>). A number of independent sources were used for consistency-checking purposes,<br />

e.g. ADB (<strong>2006</strong>), Chantanakome (<strong>2006</strong>) and Longhai (<strong>2006</strong>). Given the variability in the quality<br />

of many of the specific regional and sectoral data used, there are many uncertainties surrounding<br />

these estimates.<br />

198 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong> - THE ALTERNATIVE POLICY SCENARIO<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!