19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GW<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

Figure 13.2: Historical <strong>World</strong> Nuclear Capacity Additions<br />

1954 -<br />

1960<br />

1961-<br />

1970<br />

1971-<br />

1980<br />

1981-<br />

1990<br />

1991-<br />

2000<br />

2001-<br />

2005<br />

United States France Japan Russia Germany Other<br />

Note: Includes reactors that have been shut down (about 36 GW in total).<br />

Source: IEA analysis based on data from IAEA PRIS database.<br />

economies resulted in a slower than anticipated development of nuclear power.<br />

Many of these countries had several projects under construction or had been<br />

planning significant capacity increases at the time. Most of those projects were<br />

cancelled or suspended.<br />

Globally, nuclear capacity additions in the 1990s were less than a quarter of the<br />

additions of a decade earlier. But, despite the limiting factors, OECD countries<br />

have added about three times more capacity than non-OECD since 1990. This<br />

increase was led by Japan, France and the Republic of Korea.<br />

The share of nuclear power in world electricity generation reached its highest<br />

point in 1996, at 18% (Figure 13.3) falling to 15% by 2005. The global<br />

decrease can be explained by a small decline in the OECD as well as by the<br />

increasing weight in global electricity generation of developing countries,<br />

where the share of nuclear power was around 2.5% during that period.<br />

Nuclear electricity generation increased by 36% between 1990 and 2005. This<br />

increase reflects greater installed capacity and increases in the availability and<br />

capacity factors of nuclear power plants. Nuclear capacity increased by about<br />

14% both because of the addition of new plants and plant uprates. Improved<br />

performance was a more important influence with improved capacity factors<br />

making an important contribution to competitiveness in many cases<br />

(Figure 13.4).<br />

Chapter 13 - Prospects for Nuclear Power 349<br />

13<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!