19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The Alternative Policy Scenario assumes that measures are adopted to extend<br />

the lifetime of existing nuclear power plants or to accelerate the construction<br />

of new ones. A number of countries plan to expand the use of nuclear power.<br />

Japan, Korea, Russia, China and India have specific development targets.<br />

Extending the lifetime of existing reactors from 40 to 60 years helps maintain<br />

a higher share of nuclear power.<br />

The European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is assumed to lead to<br />

CO 2 emission reductions in the countries of the European Union through<br />

short-term switching of coal to gas in power generation in both scenarios. At the<br />

moment, there are many uncertainties about how the ETS will evolve and what<br />

the size of the caps will be. Because of the uncertainties of the scheme, long-term<br />

investment decisions are not assumed to be affected by it. In the Alternative<br />

Policy Scenario, policies that provide incentives for energy efficiency and<br />

renewables play a larger role than ETS in reducing power-sector CO 2 emissions.<br />

Transport<br />

Summary of Results<br />

In the Alternative Policy Scenario, oil savings in the transport sector account for<br />

around 60% of the total reduction in global oil demand. <strong>Energy</strong> demand in the<br />

transport sector reaches 2 800 Mtoe in 2030, about 300 Mtoe, or 10%, less than<br />

in the Reference Scenario (Table 9.3). The oil saved in transport amounts to<br />

7.6 mb/d in 2030, equal to slightly more than the current production of Iran and<br />

the United Arab Emirates combined. Those savings have profound implications<br />

for oil import needs, as described in Chapter 7. Oil products still account for 90%<br />

of transport demand in 2030, reflecting the extent of the challenge of developing<br />

commercially viable alternatives to oil to satisfy mobility needs. Because road<br />

transport currently accounts for about 80% of total transport energy demand,<br />

savings in this sector have a large impact on projected growth. In the Alternative<br />

Policy Scenario, demand for oil for road transport is 14% lower in 2030 than in<br />

the Reference Scenario. Improvements in vehicle fuel efficiency, increased use of<br />

alternative fuels – mainly biofuels – and modal shifts (shifts to different forms of<br />

transport) explain this trend. Reduced demand for aviation fuels accounts for 11%<br />

of total savings in transport energy demand. 2<br />

OECD countries see a saving of 146 Mtoe, or 9%, in this sector in 2030 in the<br />

Alternative Policy Scenario. This is driven by two divergent underlying trends.<br />

Oil savings of 183 Mtoe, or 12%, are larger than total energy savings, but they<br />

are partially offset by an increase in biofuels, gas and electricity consumption<br />

of 36 Mtoe, or 40%. The same trends occur in non-OECD countries, where<br />

2. Later in this chapter, the impact of policies on aviation fuel use is examined for the first time in<br />

the <strong>Outlook</strong>.<br />

222 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong> - THE ALTERNATIVE POLICY SCENARIO<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!