19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fuel Economy<br />

Governments intervene extensively in the transport sector, though frequently<br />

for reasons not primarily focused on the reduction of energy consumption and<br />

greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, such as road safety or reduced impact on<br />

the local environment. Some examples include traffic restrictions, education<br />

programmes for travellers, and parking and congestion charges. The effects of<br />

these policies on energy consumption and GHG reduction are more difficult<br />

to quantify than those of policies such as direct taxation on the purchase of<br />

vehicles and fuels, as well as stringent fuel economy standards for new<br />

vehicles. There are relatively fewer policies currently under discussion relating<br />

to the freight transport sector than to the passenger sector, which accounts for<br />

65% of total road-fuel consumption. Although energy demand for freight<br />

transport is expected to increase at a slightly faster rate than energy for<br />

passenger transport, it accounts for no more than 40% of road transport<br />

energy demand in 2030. Demand for freight transport is closely linked to<br />

economic activity and, given that fuel expenditures constitute a major cost of<br />

their business, freight operators have a strong financial incentive to be<br />

efficient. The assumed improvements in the efficiency of freight transport<br />

stem from operational improvements, logistical changes, shifts in modal<br />

choices and improved loading techniques aimed at reducing wasted loading<br />

space. Changes in vehicle technologies also reduce fuel consumption, but to<br />

a lesser extent than for passenger transport, which is the focus of the<br />

remainder of this subsection.<br />

Several countries have passed legislation regulating passenger car fuel<br />

efficiency, either with mandatory fuel-economy standards or through<br />

voluntary agreements with manufacturers (Table 9.4). Some countries have<br />

adopted or are considering the introduction of taxes on car ownership which<br />

are differentiated according to the fuel economy of the car. The United States,<br />

Japan and China regulate passenger car fuel efficiency through mandatory<br />

standards. Japan also regulates heavy-duty vehicle fuel economy. The<br />

European Union, Canada, Australia and Switzerland have agreed on voluntary<br />

targets for car manufacturers and importers. Japan’s Top Runner programme<br />

and the EU ACEA’s (European Automobile Manufacturers Association)<br />

voluntary targets are the most ambitious ones. US CAFE (Corporate Average<br />

Fuel Economy) standards are far less stringent, but new standards adopted by<br />

California in <strong>2006</strong> are more stringent (see Box 7.1).<br />

Car manufactures can use technological advances in vehicle design either to<br />

increase the power and performance of the vehicle or to improve its fuel<br />

efficiency. Often these aims conflict, with power improvements damaging fuel<br />

efficiency. Market forces often favour increased power. Governments can play<br />

an important role by introducing fuel efficiency regulations to force<br />

automakers to devote new technology to improving fuel efficiency.<br />

226 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong> - THE ALTERNATIVE POLICY SCENARIO<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!