19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Notwithstanding the rates of growth in national emissions, the gap between<br />

developed and developing countries in emissions per capita remains wide.<br />

OECD per-capita emissions increase slightly from 2004 levels of 11.0 tonnes,<br />

peak around 2010, decrease to 11.2 tonnes in 2015, and then continue to fall<br />

to 10.2 tonnes in 2030. Conversely, emissions in the developing world, starting<br />

in 2004 at 2.1 tonnes per capita, grow steadily, rising to 2.7 tonnes in 2030 –<br />

still a factor of four less. These per-capita differences reflect substantially lower<br />

energy consumption per person. On a CO 2 -intensity basis, they also reflect<br />

both the relative inefficiency of the energy systems in the developing world and<br />

their high reliance on fossil fuels for power.<br />

On an absolute basis, the reduction in CO 2 emissions in the Alternative<br />

Policy Scenario is greatest in countries that emit the most (Figure 7.13).<br />

Thus, China shows the largest reduction from the Reference to the<br />

Alternative Policy Scenario by 2030, with 1.6 Gt, followed by OECD North<br />

America (1.1 Gt) and OECD Europe (0.8 Gt). The smallest emissions<br />

reduction, both in absolute and percentage terms, occurs in the least<br />

developed regions, notably Africa and Latin America.<br />

At the point of use, the largest contributor to avoided CO 2 emissions is<br />

improved end-use efficiency, accounting for nearly two-thirds of total savings<br />

(Figure 7.14). 10 Fuel savings, achieved through more efficient vehicles,<br />

industrial processes and heating applications, contribute 36% in 2030, while<br />

lower electricity demand, from more efficient appliances, industrial motors and<br />

buildings, represents 29%. Switching to less carbon-intensive fossil fuels,<br />

mainly from coal to gas in power generation, and improved supply-side<br />

efficiency account for a further 13%. Increased use of renewables in power<br />

generation and of biofuels in transport account for 12%. Increased reliance on<br />

nuclear is responsible for the remaining 10%.<br />

Looking at the sources of emissions, the biggest contribution to avoided<br />

emissions comes from power generation, where emissions peak towards the end<br />

of the period, and are 3.9 Gt lower in 2030 in the Alternative Policy Scenario<br />

than in the Reference Scenario. This sector alone contributes almost two-thirds<br />

of avoided emissions globally. Emissions savings from this sector result<br />

principally from policies to promote carbon-free power generation, including<br />

policies to encourage nuclear power, and discourage the use of coal. The fastest<br />

annual growth in emissions over the <strong>Outlook</strong> period occurs in the transport<br />

sector, averaging 1.3%. Savings in this sector in 2030 in the Alternative Policy<br />

Scenario are small relative to other sectors, at 0.9 Gt, because of the limited<br />

10. Curbing CO 2 emissions through energy efficiency policies has, in most cases, significant local air<br />

pollution benefits, as the emissions of other pollutants are reduced. Those “ancillary benefits” are<br />

greater in developing countries, where air quality in big cities is, on average, worse than in the OECD<br />

(Markandya and Rübbelke, 2003).<br />

190 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong> - THE ALTERNATIVE POLICY SCENARIO<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!