19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

illion dollars (2005)<br />

Figure 8.1: Change in Cumulative Demand- and Supply-Side Investment<br />

in the Alternative Policy Scenario*, 2005-2030<br />

3 000<br />

2 000<br />

1 000<br />

0<br />

–1 000<br />

–2 000<br />

–3 000<br />

–4 000<br />

Additional<br />

demand-side<br />

investment<br />

* Compared with the Reference Scenario.<br />

Avoided<br />

supply-side<br />

investment<br />

Net change<br />

in energy<br />

investment<br />

The macroeconomic gains from more efficient energy use involve transfers of<br />

income in part from energy producers to producers of consumer end-products<br />

and new technologies, and in part from energy consumers to equipment<br />

producers and technology providers. Ultimately, consumers invest an estimated<br />

$2.4 trillion more over the projection period compared with the Reference<br />

Scenario. That additional investment is the consequence of more costly purchases<br />

of more efficient cars, industrial motors, appliances and other types of<br />

equipment. It reduces global demand for energy by 10% in 2030. As a result, the<br />

need for investment in oil, gas, coal, and electricity production and distribution<br />

is significantly lower. Cumulative investment in energy-supply infrastructure over<br />

2005-2030 amounts to $17 trillion in the Alternative Policy Scenario, about<br />

$3 trillion less than in the Reference Scenario.<br />

Investment not only shifts from supply to demand in the Alternative Policy<br />

Scenario; responsibility for investment decisions also shifts, to the innumerable<br />

individual firms and households purchasing these new goods. In the Reference<br />

Scenario, investments are made by a much smaller group of actors, primarily<br />

large energy producers and distributors. To give an idea of the magnitude of the<br />

shift, consider the output of one mid-load CCGT plant producing some 2 TWh<br />

of electricity per year. To save the same amount of electricity per year, some<br />

16 million European consumers would need to buy a 40% more efficient<br />

refrigerator. 2 This would equate to 80% of annual refrigerator sales in Europe.<br />

2. According to current labels, this is equivalent to moving from a class A refrigerator to a class A++.<br />

Chapter 8 - Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Alternative Policies 195<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!