19.01.2013 Views

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

World Energy Outlook 2006

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

to examine the issue, reflecting the difficulty of capturing all the interacting<br />

effects. Nonetheless, there is no doubt about the direction or significance of the<br />

effects: economic growth fell sharply in most oil-importing countries in the<br />

year or two following each price shock. Indeed, most of the major economic<br />

downturns in the United States, Europe and the Pacific since the 1970s were<br />

preceded by a sudden increase in the price of crude oil, although other factors<br />

were also important in some cases. Several studies involving simulations of<br />

higher energy prices have been carried out since 2000, using integrated<br />

macroeconomic models to gauge the impact of recent price rises and to predict<br />

the effects of further increases. The results of these simulations are not strictly<br />

comparable, as they are based on different assumptions about the starting point<br />

for prices and the extent and duration of the price increase, as well as the policy<br />

responses. Most such studies focus on the industrialised countries.<br />

A 2004 IEA study, carried out in collaboration with the OECD Economics<br />

Department and with the assistance of the IMF Research Department,<br />

estimated the impact of a $10 per barrel rise from $25 to $35 in the<br />

international oil price on importing regions and for the world as a whole. It<br />

found that OECD countries would lose up to 0.4% of GDP in the first and<br />

second years of higher prices compared to the base case. Inflation would rise by<br />

half a percentage point and unemployment would increase by 0.1 percentage<br />

points. Euro-zone countries, which are highly dependent on oil imports, would<br />

suffer most in the short term, their GDP dropping by as much as 0.5% and<br />

inflation rising by 0.5 percentage points in the first year. The United States<br />

would suffer least, with GDP falling by 0.3%, largely because indigenous<br />

production meets a bigger share of its oil needs. Japan’s GDP would fall by<br />

0.4%, with its relatively low oil intensity compensating to some extent for its<br />

almost total dependence on imported oil. In all OECD regions, these losses<br />

start to diminish in the following three years as global trade in non-oil goods<br />

and services recovers.<br />

The adverse economic impact of higher oil prices on oil-importing developing<br />

countries is generally more severe than for OECD countries, because their<br />

economies are more dependent on imported oil and are more energy-intensive.<br />

Heavily indebted poor countries on average would lose 1.6% of GDP and<br />

sub-Saharan African countries as a whole more than 3% in the year following<br />

a $10 oil-price increase. GDP in oil-importing developing Asian countries<br />

would be 0.8% lower. Overall, world GDP would be at least 0.5% lower<br />

– equivalent to $255 billion – in the year following a $10 oil price increase.<br />

This is because the economic stimulus provided by higher oil-export earnings<br />

in exporting countries would be more than outweighed by the depressive effect<br />

of higher prices on economic activity in the importing countries.<br />

302 <strong>World</strong> <strong>Energy</strong> <strong>Outlook</strong> <strong>2006</strong> - FOCUS ON KEY TOPICS<br />

© OECD/IEA, 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!