16.03.2017 Views

12.Practice.Tests.for.the.SAT_2015-2016_1128p

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 2 Practice <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SAT</strong><br />

108 Practice Test One Answers and Explanations<br />

22. E<br />

Difficulty: High<br />

The correct answer should also match <strong>the</strong> author's tone in<br />

<strong>the</strong> passage. Consider <strong>the</strong> attitude of <strong>the</strong> author up until<br />

this point in <strong>the</strong> passage regarding lip-synching. While in <strong>the</strong><br />

first paragraph he did not defend Milli Vanilli's lip-synching,<br />

he did state that those who would accuse <strong>the</strong>m of gross<br />

wrongdoing simply do not comprehend <strong>the</strong> bigger, more<br />

complex picture. That more complex picture is his argument<br />

that pop music is a product that appeals to <strong>the</strong> masses<br />

because it is based in illusion, not reality. Look <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

answer that best matches up with this argument.<br />

Choice (A) is an opposite; based on <strong>the</strong> author's argument,<br />

you can infer that he would not consider <strong>the</strong> media<br />

questioning <strong>the</strong> singer's talent to be completely reasonable.<br />

Choice (B) is extreme; in line 17, <strong>the</strong> author admits that<br />

<strong>the</strong> people who criticize Milli Vanilli do have a point, so<br />

it can be assumed that he would never characterize <strong>the</strong><br />

consequence of <strong>the</strong> singer's lip-synching as something so<br />

extreme as totally ridiculous. Choice (C) is out of scope; <strong>the</strong><br />

passage mentioned earlier cases of lip-synching in popular<br />

music. There should be nothing particularly shocking about<br />

it. Choice (D) is an opposite; in fact, <strong>the</strong>re is a precedent<br />

mentioned in <strong>the</strong> passage, and <strong>the</strong> consequence of Milli<br />

Vanilli's lip-synching was much more severe than <strong>the</strong><br />

singer's. Choice (E) fits your prediction.<br />

23. B<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

Make a prediction be<strong>for</strong>e looking at <strong>the</strong> choices. The easiest<br />

way to answer this Detail question is to come up with your<br />

own word that best sums up <strong>the</strong> audience's expectations<br />

and <strong>the</strong>n find <strong>the</strong> answer choice that most closely matches<br />

it. The sentence states that an audience expects pop stars<br />

to be able to pull off tightly choreographed dance moves<br />

on <strong>the</strong> stage, all <strong>the</strong> while maintaining perfect vocal pitch<br />

and not losing a breath while <strong>the</strong>y per<strong>for</strong>m songs that took<br />

hours, if not days, to produce in a studio. Predict something<br />

like "overly demanding."<br />

Choice (A) is extreme; while <strong>the</strong> expectations may be<br />

unreasonable, <strong>the</strong>y aren't absurd. Choice (B) matches <strong>the</strong><br />

prediction nicely. Choice (C) is out of scope; <strong>the</strong> expectations<br />

may indeed be overwhelming <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> pop star, but <strong>the</strong>y are<br />

not described as such in <strong>the</strong> passage. Choice (D) is out of<br />

scope; this choice is not supported by any detail from <strong>the</strong><br />

passage. Choice (E) is out of scope; optimism is ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

sentiment not supported by any detail from <strong>the</strong> passage.<br />

<br />

24. c<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

Scan <strong>the</strong> paragraph <strong>for</strong> remarks that sound like a conclusion.<br />

Note <strong>the</strong> author's concluding statement in <strong>the</strong> final<br />

sentence of <strong>the</strong> paragraph: The pop star is not to blame<br />

when <strong>the</strong>se illusions are broken; it is <strong>the</strong> fault of those<br />

who believe in <strong>the</strong> illusion in <strong>the</strong> first place. This sums up<br />

<strong>the</strong> main idea of <strong>the</strong> paragraph (and <strong>the</strong> passage as well).<br />

Predict something like doing what is required of <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Choice (A) is distortion; <strong>the</strong> power of record company<br />

executives is depicted in <strong>the</strong> passage, but nowhere is it<br />

suggested that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>for</strong>ce pop stars to lip-synch. Choice (B)<br />

is distortion; <strong>the</strong> author does discuss live per<strong>for</strong>mances,<br />

but he doesn't suggest that pop stars should never per<strong>for</strong>m<br />

live. Choice (C) matches your prediction. Choice (D) is out<br />

of scope; <strong>the</strong> passage never suggests that lip-synching pop<br />

stars are a trivial matter in <strong>the</strong> grand scheme of things.<br />

Choice (E) is an opposite; in lines 87-88, <strong>the</strong> author states<br />

that <strong>the</strong> public is fueling <strong>the</strong> market to keep producing<br />

more such artists.<br />

25. B<br />

Difficulty: Medium<br />

You should be able to predict an answer to this question<br />

after every passage you read; be sure to practice it. This<br />

Global question asks <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary purpose of <strong>the</strong><br />

passage, which means it addresses <strong>the</strong> entire passage, not<br />

just individual details. To best answer this question, think<br />

about <strong>the</strong> author's reasons <strong>for</strong> writing <strong>the</strong> passage. In <strong>the</strong><br />

very first paragraph, he offers his opinion on <strong>the</strong> criticism<br />

of lip-synching in pop music, saying that <strong>the</strong> critics simply<br />

do not comprehend <strong>the</strong> bigger, more complex picture. He<br />

<strong>the</strong>n spends <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> passage trying to explain his<br />

position, using facts and details to prove his points. Predict<br />

something like advance a position on a controversial topic.<br />

Choice (A) is out of scope; <strong>the</strong> author never offers a<br />

solution, nor does he necessarily consider lip-synching a<br />

problem. Choice (B) fits well. Choice (C) is distortion; <strong>the</strong><br />

author does draw a comparison between fashion and<br />

pop music in <strong>the</strong> second paragraph, but it is a supporting<br />

detail in <strong>the</strong> passage, not <strong>the</strong> purpose of it. Choice (D)<br />

is distortion; again, this is just a supporting detail of <strong>the</strong><br />

passage. Choice (E) is out of scope; it is never mentioned<br />

anywhere in <strong>the</strong> passage that <strong>the</strong> author's argument is a<br />

revival of an old one.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!