16.03.2017 Views

12.Practice.Tests.for.the.SAT_2015-2016_1128p

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1 2 Practice <strong>Tests</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>SAT</strong><br />

216<br />

Practice Test Two Answers an d Exp l anations<br />

juxtaposition of in<strong>for</strong>mation suggests that <strong>the</strong> gap involves<br />

a difference between how long people are living and how<br />

long <strong>the</strong>y are able to drive. Since <strong>the</strong> phrase life expectancy<br />

seems to refer to how long a person can be expected to<br />

live, driving expectancy most likely refers to how long a<br />

person can be expected to drive.<br />

Choice (A) is out of scope; <strong>the</strong> passage never mentions<br />

when most people actually do decide to stop driving.<br />

Choice (B) is a distortion; as <strong>the</strong> word driving suggests,<br />

<strong>the</strong> cited phrase is not referring to <strong>the</strong> number of people<br />

who rely on public transportation. Choice (C) is a good<br />

match <strong>for</strong> your prediction. Choice (0) is out of scope; <strong>the</strong><br />

passage never gives a year when researchers expect <strong>the</strong><br />

crisis to begin. Choice (E) is a distortion; while this group is<br />

mentioned earlier in <strong>the</strong> passage, it does not fit <strong>the</strong> context<br />

surrounding <strong>the</strong> cited phrase.<br />

12. B<br />

Difficu l ty: Medium<br />

Where is <strong>the</strong> possibility of a transportation crisis first<br />

mentioned? Going directly to this part of <strong>the</strong> text will save<br />

you time. Look <strong>for</strong> clues in <strong>the</strong> question stem that can save<br />

you time by pointing you to a particular part of <strong>the</strong> text.<br />

Note that <strong>the</strong> question is specifically asking why <strong>the</strong>re could<br />

soon be a transportation crisis. These words should narrow<br />

your research to <strong>the</strong> first sentence of <strong>the</strong> passage, which<br />

describes an impending situation: <strong>the</strong> remarkably populous<br />

post-World War II generation is getting to be an age where<br />

people should begin using public transportation more.<br />

Choice (A) is a misused detail; while <strong>the</strong> passage<br />

supports this statement, it is <strong>the</strong> lack of adequate public<br />

transportation elsewhere that may create <strong>the</strong> crisis. Choice<br />

(B) is a good match <strong>for</strong> your prediction. Choice (C) is a<br />

distortion; <strong>the</strong> passage does not suggest that researchers<br />

are increasingly advising seniors to stop driving. Choice<br />

(0) is a misused detail; while <strong>the</strong> last sentence makes this<br />

point, this in<strong>for</strong>mation does not describe why <strong>the</strong>re may<br />

soon be a transportation crisis. Choice (E) is out of scope;<br />

<strong>the</strong> passage does not explore changing life expectancies or<br />

driving expectancies.<br />

Questions 13-24<br />

In Passage 1, <strong>the</strong> author discusses ways that she believes<br />

museums have regrettably diminished <strong>the</strong> intellectual<br />

content of <strong>the</strong>ir exhibits in an attempt to lure more patrons.<br />

In paragraph 1, she explains that museums are struggling<br />

and <strong>the</strong>re<strong>for</strong>e are trying new things to entice visitors,<br />

with mixed results. In paragraph 2, she discusses <strong>the</strong><br />

worst of such results-that exhibits are dumbed down. In<br />

paragraph 3, she defines edutainment as passive learning.<br />

In paragraph 4, she concludes with <strong>the</strong> assertion that a<br />

museum ought to provide what <strong>for</strong>-profit enterprises do<br />

not active scholarship.<br />

In Passage 2, <strong>the</strong> author advocates making museums<br />

accessible to <strong>the</strong> general public, ra<strong>the</strong>r than simply<br />

to people who have already studied a particular topic<br />

extensively. In paragraph 1, she frames <strong>the</strong> opposition<br />

argument as snobbery. In paragraph 2, she argues that new,<br />

accessible exhibits are not dumbed down at all, but include<br />

more in<strong>for</strong>mation to increase <strong>the</strong> layperson's appreciation<br />

of <strong>the</strong> exhibit without sacrificing things of interest to <strong>the</strong><br />

scholar. In paragraph 3, she applauds <strong>the</strong> use of interactive<br />

exhibits to appeal to people with different learning styles.<br />

In paragraph 4, she affirms that <strong>the</strong> function of a public<br />

institution is to appeal to <strong>the</strong> public.<br />

13. A<br />

Difficu l ty: Medium<br />

When <strong>the</strong> passages appear to take opposing views, any<br />

point of agreement will be fairly broad-something that<br />

virtually anyone would agree with. The author of Passage<br />

1 says, The museum's job should be to inspire <strong>the</strong> visitor<br />

to look deeper, not to <strong>for</strong>ce-feed <strong>the</strong>m predigested facts<br />

(lines 44-46). The author of Passage 2 says, The purpose<br />

of <strong>the</strong>se exhibits is . .. to introduce [visitors] to an area of<br />

knowledge that <strong>the</strong>y have not been exposed to be<strong>for</strong>e,<br />

and inspire <strong>the</strong>m to want to learn more (lines 83-89). The<br />

authors agree that museums should inspire a visitor to learn<br />

more about <strong>the</strong> subject.<br />

Choice (A) matches your prediction nicely. Choice (B) is an<br />

opposite; <strong>the</strong> author of Passage 2 specifically says that this is<br />

NOT <strong>the</strong> point of a museum exhibit. Choice (C) is a distortion;<br />

<strong>the</strong> author of Passage 1 speaks negatively about modeling<br />

exhibits on entertainmenc and <strong>the</strong> author of Passage 2, while<br />

supporting <strong>the</strong>se exhibits, never says that <strong>the</strong> purpose of <strong>the</strong>m<br />

is to be fun. Choice (0) is a misused detail; Passage 1 briefly<br />

mentions funding cuts, but it does not cast fund-raising as a<br />

primary purpose of a museum. Choice (E) is an opposite; <strong>the</strong><br />

author of Passage 2 argues specifically against this.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!